首页> 外文期刊>European environmental law review >From Environmental Insurance to Environmental Derivatives?
【24h】

From Environmental Insurance to Environmental Derivatives?

机译:从环境保险到环境衍生品?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Economists propose to use certain financial instruments (like put options and call options) in order to solve two key issues of Environmental Security: funding and prevention. In particular they propose to substitute traditional environmental security instruments (like liability and insurance) for derivative contracts. Although both insurance and derivatives are financial instruments since they allocate financial resources, they are substantially different and need to be distinguished. In this article, I will illustrate the two instruments and discuss differences. Insurance can't be substituted for derivatives, but need to be reconsidered and innovated, particularly in the case of coverage of catastrophic events through the intervention of public reinsurers or of Citizens Insurance Corporation acting as insurance of last resort. Moreover it is possible to design an interplay between insurance and derivative contracts in order to achieve the two basic goals of environmental security: funding and prevention.
机译:经济学家建议使用某些金融工具(如认沽期权和看涨期权)来解决环境安全的两个关键问题:资金和预防。他们特别建议用传统的环境安全手段(如责任和保险)代替衍生合同。尽管保险和衍生工具都分配金融资源,所以它们都是金融工具,但它们有很大的不同,需要加以区别。在本文中,我将说明这两种工具并讨论差异。保险不能代替衍生品,而是需要重新考虑和创新,特别是在通过公共再保险公司或作为最后保险的公民保险公司的干预来覆盖灾难性事件的情况下。此外,可以设计保险合同和衍生合同之间的相互作用,以实现环境安全的两个基本目标:资金和预防。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European environmental law review》 |2013年第6期|228-234|共7页
  • 作者

    Sara Landini;

  • 作者单位

    Private Law,University of Florence;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:43:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号