首页> 外文期刊>Ethnic and Racial Studies >Culture, utility or social systems? Explaining the cross-national ties of emigrants from Bora, Romania
【24h】

Culture, utility or social systems? Explaining the cross-national ties of emigrants from Bora, Romania

机译:文化,公用事业或社会制度?解释来自罗马尼亚波拉岛的移民的跨国联系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Emigrants from Bora, Romania, display two quite distinct patterns of ties with their community of origin: migration to Italy is discernibly transnational, with a strong reliance on migrant networks; while migration to the UK is more individualistic, with emigrants shunning interaction with compatriots and retaining only weak ties to Bora. We argue that prevalent theories of cross-national ties fail adequately to explain this divergence. Instead, we draw on systems theory to explain the discrepancy in terms of divergent conditions for societal inclusion. In Italy, incorporation into parallel, unofficial structures of work, welfare and accommodation encouraged a reliance on cultural criteria for maintaining social ties. In the UK, migrants were obliged to integrate into state-sponsored systems, encouraging the relinquishing of ethnic ties in favour of more strategic networking to facilitate societal inclusion.
机译:来自罗马尼亚波拉岛的移民与原籍社区有着两种截然不同的联系方式:移民到意大利显然是跨国的,对移民网络的依赖度很高。而移民到英国则更加个人主义,移民回避了与同胞的互动,只保留了与波拉的弱势联系。我们认为,跨国关系的普遍理论不足以解释这种分歧。相反,我们利用系统理论从社会包容的不同条件来解释差异。在意大利,将平行的,非正式的工作,福利和住宿结构纳入其中,鼓励人们依靠文化标准来维持社会联系。在英国,移民有义务融入国家资助的制度中,鼓励放弃族裔纽带,转而采用更具战略意义的网络来促进社会包容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号