首页> 外文期刊>Ethics, Place and Environment >Misplaced Ethics of Climate Change: Political vs. Environmental Geography
【24h】

Misplaced Ethics of Climate Change: Political vs. Environmental Geography

机译:错位的气候变化伦理:政治与环境地理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Climate change diplomacy is routinely characterized by preoccupation with narrow and short-term perceived national interests rather than the pressing need to mitigate global warming and respond aggressively to its impacts. This was amply demonstrated by the much-anticipated December 2009 United Nations conference on climate change in Copenhagen, which failed to reach any formal or binding agreement on steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or to deal with the impacts of global warming. The Copenhagen conference revealed a fundamental flaw in the international politics of climate change, namely underlying norms and ethics that place nearly all value and importance in states and their national interests, rather than in the people who ultimately cause and are affected by climate change.
机译:气候变化外交通常的特点是全神贯注于狭and和短期的国家利益,而不是迫切需要减轻全球变暖并积极应对其影响。备受期待的2009年12月在哥本哈根召开的联合国气候变化会议充分证明了这一点,该会议未能就减少温室气体排放或应对全球变暖的影响的步骤达成任何正式或有约束力的协议。哥本哈根会议揭示了国际气候变化政治的根本缺陷,即基本准则和道德规范几乎将所有价值和重要性置于国家及其国家利益上,而不是在最终引起气候变化并受其影响的人民手中。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics, Place and Environment》 |2010年第2期|p.215-222|共8页
  • 作者

    PAUL G. HARRIS;

  • 作者单位

    Global and Environmental Studies at the Hong Kong Institute of Education;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:22:12

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号