首页> 外文期刊>Ethics, policy and environment >The Case for Discounting the Future
【24h】

The Case for Discounting the Future

机译:未来打折的理由

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Though economists appear to discount future well-being when evaluating the costs of climate change, plausible justifications of this practice have not been forthcoming.The methods of economists thus seem to contravene the requirements of justice by discounting the moral importance of future well-being simply because it exists in the future. I defend the practice of discounting the future against the charge of injustice on grounds that moral theorists of different stripes can accept. I argue that, because public policy choices are 'identity-affecting', the probability that some policy choice will constitute a harm for members of a population diminishes the further we look into the future. This constitutes a plausible justification of discounting the future.
机译:尽管经济学家在评估气候变化成本时似乎在轻视未来的福祉,但这种做法的合理论据尚未出现,因此经济学家的方法似乎通过简单地轻视未来福祉的道德重要性而违反了正义的要求。因为它存在于未来。我捍卫以不公正为由对未来进行折价的做法,理由是不同理论的道德理论家可以接受。我认为,由于公共政策选择会“影响身份”,因此,我们对未来的展望越深,某些政策选择将对人口成员构成伤害的可能性就越小。这构成了轻视未来的合理理由。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics, policy and environment》 |2016年第2期|213-230|共18页
  • 作者

    Duncan Purves;

  • 作者单位

    Environmental Studies Department and Center for Bioethics, New York University, New York, NY, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:21:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号