...
首页> 外文期刊>Ethics and information technology >Beware! Uncle Sam has your DNA: Legal fallout from its use and misuse in the U.S.
【24h】

Beware! Uncle Sam has your DNA: Legal fallout from its use and misuse in the U.S.

机译:谨防!山姆大叔有你的基因:在美国使用和滥用会带来法律后果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Technology has provided state and federal governments with huge collections of DNA samples and identifying profiles stored in databanks. That information can be used to solve crimes by matching samples from convicted felons to unsolved crimes, and has aided law enforcement in investigating and convicting suspects, and exonerating innocent felons, even after lengthy incarceration. Rights surrounding the provision of DNA samples, however, remain unclear in light of the constitutional guarantee against "unreasonable searches and seizures" and privacy concerns. The courts have just begun to consider this issue, and have provided little guidance. It is unclear whether the laws governing protected health information are applicable to the instant situation, and if so, the degree to which they apply. DNA databanks are not uniformly regulated, and it is possible that DNA samples contained in them may be used for purposes unintended by donors of the samples. As people live their lives, they leave bits of their DNA behind. They cannot be assured that these tiny specimens will not be taken or used against their will or without their knowledge for activities such as profiling to measure tendencies such as thrill-seeking, aggressiveness, or crimes with threatening behavior. Existing racial or ethnic discrimination and profiling may also encompass genetic discrimination and profiling, creating societal class distinctions. This article will explore the constitutionality of collecting genetic materials, the ethics of such activities, and balance the social good in solving crime and deterrence against the individual's security, liberty, and privacy.
机译:技术为州和联邦政府提供了大量的DNA样本,并可以识别存储在数据库中的配置文件。通过将定罪重罪的样本与未解决的犯罪进行匹配,该信息可用于解决犯罪,甚至在长期监禁之后,也有助于执法部门对犯罪嫌疑人进行调查和定罪,并释放无罪的重罪。但是,鉴于针对“不合理的搜查和扣押”和隐私问题的宪法保证,围绕提供DNA样品的权利仍然不明确。法院刚刚开始考虑这个问题,几乎没有提供指导。目前尚不清楚管辖受保护健康信息的法律是否适用于当前情况,如果适用,适用的程度。 DNA数据库的管理不统一,其中包含的DNA样本可能会用于样本供者所不希望的目的。随着人们的生活,他们留下了自己的DNA片段。他们无法保证这些微小的标本不会违背或遗忘,或者在不了解其活动的情况下就不会被使用或使用,例如进行轮廓分析,以测量诸如寻求刺激,攻击性或具有威胁性行为的犯罪倾向。现有的种族或族裔歧视和概况分析可能还包括基因歧视和概况分析,从而造成了社会阶级差异。本文将探讨收集遗传材料的合宪性,此类活动的道德规范,并在解决犯罪和威慑方面的社会利益与个人的安全,自由和隐私权之间取得平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号