首页> 外文期刊>Ergonomics >Comparison of perceived comfort differences between standard and experimental load carriage systems
【24h】

Comparison of perceived comfort differences between standard and experimental load carriage systems

机译:比较标准载物台系统和实验载物台系统之间的舒适度差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The current popularity of backpack-type load carriage systems (LCS) by students has precipitated a prevalence of postural abnormalities and pain. This study compared subjective perceptual comfort in standard and vertically loaded LCSs. Sixteen females ages 18-23 years rated their personal LCSs for perceived shoulder, neck, and lower back comfort and for overall comfort, each day for two weeks using 100 mm visual analogue scales (VAS). Each scale contained polar extremities of 'very comfortable' to 'very uncomfortable' and a vertical mark placed on the 100 mm line by the participants indicated their perception of comfort. Following two weeks, participants were given LCSs that distributed the weight vertically and were asked to rate the system in the same way for an additional two-week period. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in shoulder (p = 0.015), neck (p = 0.005), and lower back (p = 0.036) comfort and overall comfort (p = 0.001) between the participants' personal LCSs and the experimental LCS. In conclusion, vertical load placement may redistribute the load in a manner that reduces symptoms of selected anatomical discomfort.
机译:当前,背包式负载运输系统(LCS)在学生中越来越受欢迎,这导致了姿势异常和疼痛的流行。这项研究比较了标准和垂直负荷LCS中的主观感知舒适度。 16天年龄在18-23岁之间的女性使用100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)对他们的个人LCS进行了2周的评估,以评估其肩部,颈部和下背部的舒适度以及总体舒适度。每个刻度尺都包含“非常舒适”到“非常不舒适”的极肢,并且参与者在100毫米线上放置一个垂直标记,表示他们对舒适度的感觉。两周后,为参与者提供了LCS,这些LCS在垂直方向上分配了重量,并被要求以相同的方式对系统进行额外的两周评估。统计分析表明,参与者的个人LCS和实验LCS之间的肩膀(p = 0.015),颈部(p = 0.005)和下背部(p = 0.036)和整体舒适度(p = 0.001)存在显着差异。总之,垂直负荷放置可以以减轻选定的解剖不适症状的方式重新分配负荷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号