...
首页> 外文期刊>Environments >Environmental Law and the Paradox of Ecological Citizenship: The Case for Environmental Libertarianism
【24h】

Environmental Law and the Paradox of Ecological Citizenship: The Case for Environmental Libertarianism

机译:环境法与生态公民悖论:环境自由主义的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article presents an argument for the application of libertarian principles to environmental law. An environmental libertarian strategy is based on abstract, generally applicable rules and the right of individuals to be free from the interference of others - which, when reconciled with the concept of ecological citizenship, includes the right to ecosystem conditions unchanged by the actions of fellow human beings. Two trends illustrate the ineffectiveness of modern environmental law: the acceleration of ecosystem decline, and the growth of arbitrariness in environmental regulation. The conflation of libertarian premises and ecological protection is contrary to conventional wisdom, but their reconciliation would limit the use of discretionary power in environmental governance and thus make it possible to stem the incremental alteration of ecosystems by human action. The article concludes that libertarian theory calls for ecosystem protection; and that ecosystem protection can be accomplished most effectively when pursued in a manner consistent with libertarian principles.
机译:本文提出了将自由主义原则应用于环境法的观点。环境自由主义策略基于抽象的,普遍适用的规则以及个人不受他人干扰的权利-当与生态公民概念相协调时,其包括由人类同伴的行为改变的生态系统条件权众生。两种趋势说明了现代环境法的无效性:生态系统衰退的加速和环境监管中任意性的增长。自由主义者的前提与生态保护的融合违背了传统观念,但是它们的和解将限制在环境治理中使用自由裁量权,因此有可能阻止人类行为对生态系统的不断改变。文章得出结论,自由主义理论要求生态系统的保护。采取与自由主义原则一致的方式,可以最有效地实现生态系统保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号