首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Values >Value Pluralism and Consistency Maximisation in the Writings of Aldo Leopold: Moving Beyond Callicott's Interpretations of the Land Ethic
【24h】

Value Pluralism and Consistency Maximisation in the Writings of Aldo Leopold: Moving Beyond Callicott's Interpretations of the Land Ethic

机译:阿尔多·利奥波德(Aldo Leopold)著作中的价值多元化和一致性最大化:超越Callicott对土地伦理的解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The seventieth anniversary of Aldo Leopold's A Sand County Almanac (1949) approaches. For philosophers - environmental ethicists in particular - this text has been highly influential, especially the 'Land Ethic' essay contained therein. Given philosophers' acumen for identifying and critiquing arguments, one might reasonably expect a firm grasp of Leopold's ideas to have emerged from such attention. I argue that this is not the case. Specifically, Leopold's main interpreter and systematiser, philosopher J. Baird Callicott, has shoehorned Aldo Leopold's ideas into differing monistic moral theories that ill serve a proper understanding. Against Callicott, my paper argues that Aldo Leopold embraces a robust moral pluralism, one that goes beyond mere pragmatics, and he does so while seeking a consistency maximisation of values. A new, improved understanding of Leopold's ideas thus emerges.
机译:阿尔多·利奥波德(Aldo Leopold)的《沙县年鉴》(A Sand County Almanac,1949)诞生70周年。对于哲学家-尤其是环境伦理学家-该文本具有很大的影响力,尤其是其中包含的“土地伦理”论文。鉴于哲学家识别和批评论点的敏锐性,人们可以合理地期望从这样的关注中出现对利奥波德思想的牢固掌握。我认为事实并非如此。具体地说,利奥波德的主要解释者和系统化者哲学家J.贝尔德·卡里科特(J. Baird Callicott)使阿尔多·利奥波德的想法陷入了各种一元的道德理论中,这些理论都无法正确理解。针对卡里科特,我的论文认为,阿尔多·利奥波德(Aldo Leopold)拥有强大的道德多元主义,这超越了单纯的语用学,而他这样做是在寻求价值的一致性最大化时。因此,人们对Leopold的思想有了新的,更好的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号