首页> 外文期刊>Environmental toxicology and chemistry >In Response: Challenges and opportunities for landscape ecotoxicology and spatially explicit risk assessment-An industry perspective
【24h】

In Response: Challenges and opportunities for landscape ecotoxicology and spatially explicit risk assessment-An industry perspective

机译:回应:景观生态毒理学和空间明确的风险评估的挑战与机遇-行业观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Methods to quantify and communicate the environmental risk associated with the use of chemicals during their life cycle (production through disposal) have been developed over the past 50 yr. As the science and protection goals developed, more risk-assessment methods have been added (often piecemeal and discipline-focused), leading to guidance becoming ever more comprehensive but also much more complex and in places disjointed. Consequently, current prospective environmental risk-assessment approaches for chemicals were not designed to inform today's complex risk-management decisions, and there is a mismatch between measures of risk and protection goals. For example, it is generally agreed that ecotoxicity, life history, and spatiotemporal distributions of both exposure and populations all influence risk substantially. However, most risk assessments are based on point estimates using ecotoxicological information from laboratory species. Therefore, an integrated approach to address these challenges to transform and harmonize environmental risk assessments is needed. To achieve that, we believe there are 3 key scientific challenges: 1) the definition of protection goals that matter to society and matching measures of risks and benefits, 2) the development and use of accurate and relevant spatially explicit exposure, and 3) mechanistic effects models (e.g., ecological models and toxicokinetic-toxicody-namic models).
机译:在过去的50年中,已经开发出量化和传达与化学品在其生命周期(通过处置生产)相关的环境风险的方法。随着科学和保护目标的发展,增加了更多的风险评估方法(通常是零散的和以学科为重点),从而导致指导变得更加全面,但也变得更加复杂,并且在某些地方脱节。因此,当前针对化学品的前瞻性环境风险评估方法并非旨在为当今复杂的风险管理决策提供依据,并且风险度量与保护目标之间存在不匹配。例如,人们普遍同意,生态毒性,生活史以及暴露和人群的时空分布都将对风险产生重大影响。但是,大多数风险评估是基于使用实验室物种生态毒理学信息进行的点估计。因此,需要一种综合方法来应对这些挑战,以转变和协调环境风险评估。为实现这一目标,我们认为存在3个主要的科学挑战:1)确定对社会重要的保护目标以及相匹配的风险和收益衡量标准; 2)开发和使用准确且相关的空间明确暴露;以及3)机制效应模型(例如,生态模型和毒代动力学-毒性-自然模型)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental toxicology and chemistry》 |2014年第6期|1194-1196|共3页
  • 作者单位

    Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Colworth Science Park Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom;

    Syngenta, Environmental Safety, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre Bracknell, United Kingdom;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:29:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号