...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Technology >Kinetic of denitrification and enhanced biological phosphorous removal (EBPR) of a trickling filter operated in a sequence-batch-reactor-mode (SBR-TF)
【24h】

Kinetic of denitrification and enhanced biological phosphorous removal (EBPR) of a trickling filter operated in a sequence-batch-reactor-mode (SBR-TF)

机译:在序列 - 批量反应器 - 模式(SBR-TF)中操作的滴定滤波器的脱氮和增强的生物磷去除(EBPR)的动力学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Due to their limited ability for nutrient removal, trickling filter systems (TFS) have almost fallen into oblivion today, even though they are robust and energy-efficient treatment systems. The advantage of this process technology, however, is the sessile biomass, which allows long periods of starvation without rinsing out the biomass. Therefore, this technology is promising for treating organic-polluted, intermittent stormwater-runoff. Several combinations with activated sludge systems (ASS) use the trickling filter as pre-treatment, requiring two separate treatment systems. This combines the advantages of both systems, but is paid with increased investment costs and space requirement. Due to these concerns, a trickling filter was developed that allows a nutrient removal without an additional ASS and exemplary tested for treating stormwater runoff of a silo facility. Beside aerobic conditions, anoxic and anaerobic steps have to be ensured during the process for nutrient removal. For this, the TFS is ponded with a mix of purified wastewater from the secondary clarification tank (containing nitrate) and untreated raw water (containing degradable COD). This allows both, an integration of upstream-denitrification and enhanced-biological-phosphorous-removal (EBPR). During the anoxic step, nitrate removal rates of 0.8 kg(COD) m(-3) d(-1) can be expected, whereas a maximum COD removal rate of 4.5 kg(COD) m(-3) d(-1) are achieved. To support complete nitrification of ammonia, a COD removal rate below 0.5 kg(COD) m(-3) d(-1) is recommended. The anaerobic/aerobic PO4 uptake rate of the EBPR was 31%. These results show that a combination of trickling filter with ASS in one single reactor is feasible.
机译:由于它们的营养消除能力有限,即使它们是坚固且节能的治疗系统,涓涓细流过滤系统(TFS)几乎已经陷入了遗忘。然而,该方法技术的优点是无梗死生物量,其允许长时间的饥饿而不漂洗生物质。因此,该技术是对处理有机污染的,间歇性暴雨水径流量的希望。具有活性污泥系统(ASS)的几种组合使用涓流滤波器作为预处理,需要两个单独的处理系统。这结合了两个系统的优点,但是通过增加的投资成本和空间要求来支付。由于这些问题,开发了一种涓流过滤器,其允许营养去除而没有附加灰和用于治疗筒仓设施的雨水径流的示例性测试。除了有氧条件外,必须在营养成分过程中确保缺氧和厌氧步骤。为此,通过次级澄清罐(含有硝酸盐)和未处理的原水(含可降解鳕鱼)的纯化废水混合物进行池塘。这允许两者兼容上游反硝化和增强生物磷去除(EBPR)的整合。在缺氧步骤期间,可以预期0.8kg(COD)m(-3)d(-1)的硝酸盐去除速率,而最大COD去除率为4.5千克(COD)M(-3)D(-1)实现。为了支持氨的完全硝化,建议使用低于0.5千克(COD)M(-3)D(-1)的COD去除率。 EBPR的厌氧/有氧PO4摄取率为31%。这些结果表明,在一个单一反应器中具有屁股的滴流过滤器的组合是可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号