首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Validation of Bayesian Kriging of Arsenic, Chromium, Lead, and Mercury Surface Soil Concentrations Based on Internode Sampling
【24h】

Validation of Bayesian Kriging of Arsenic, Chromium, Lead, and Mercury Surface Soil Concentrations Based on Internode Sampling

机译:基于节点间采样的砷,铬,铅和汞表面土壤浓度的贝叶斯克里金法验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Bayesian kriging is a useful tool for estimating spatial distributions of metals; however, estimates are generally only verified statistically. In this study surface soil samples were collected on a uniform grid and analyzed for As, Cr, Pb, and Hg. The data were interpolated at individual locations by Bayesian kriging. Estimates were validated using a leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) statistical method which compared the measured and LOOCV predicted values. Validation also was carried out using additional field sampling of soil metal concentrations at points between original sampling locations, which were compared to kriging prediction distributions. LOOCV results suggest that Bayesian kriging was a good predictor of metal concentrations. When measured internode metal concentrations and estimated kriged values were compared, the measured values were located within the 5th-95th percentile prediction distributions in over half of the internode locations. Estimated and measured internode concentrations were most similar for As and Pb. Kriged estimates did not compare as well to measured values for concentrations below the analytical minimum detection limit, or for internode samples that were very close to the original sampling node. Despite inherent variability in metal concentrations in soils, the kriged estimates were validated statistically and by in situ measurement.
机译:贝叶斯克里金法是估计金属空间分布的有用工具。但是,估计数通常仅在统计上得到验证。在这项研究中,地面土壤样品被收集在均匀的网格上,并分析了砷,铬,铅和汞。通过贝叶斯克里金插值法在各个位置插值数据。使用留一法交叉验证(LOOCV)统计方法验证估计值,该方法比较了测量值和LOOCV预测值。还使用原始采样位置之间的点处的土壤金属浓度的其他野外采样进行了验证,并将其与克里金法预测分布进行了比较。 LOOCV结果表明贝叶斯克里金法可以很好地预测金属浓度。当比较测得的节间金属浓度和估计的kriged值时,测得的值位于节点间一半以上位置的第5至95个百分位数预测分布内。砷和铅的估计和测得的节点间浓度最相似。对于低于分析最小检出限的浓度,或者对于非常接近原始采样节点的节点间样品,Kriged估计值也无法与测量值进行比较。尽管土壤中金属浓度存在内在的变化,但克里格法估计值仍通过统计和现场测量得到了验证。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2009年第12期|4432-4438|共7页
  • 作者单位

    School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 715 N. Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003 Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29208;

    Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29208;

    Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29425;

    Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29425 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, 800 Sumter Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29208;

    Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of South Carolina, 3209 Colonial Drive, Columbia, South Carolina 29203;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:04:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号