首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Relationship and Variation of qPCR and Culturable Enterococci Estimates in Ambient Surface Waters Are Predictable
【24h】

Relationship and Variation of qPCR and Culturable Enterococci Estimates in Ambient Surface Waters Are Predictable

机译:qPCR和可培养肠球菌估计在周围地表水中的关系和变化是可预测的。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method provides rapid estimates of fecal indicator bacteria densities that have been indicated to be useful in the assessment of water quality. Primarily because this method provides faster results than standard culture-based methods, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is currently considering its use as a basis for revised ambient water quality criteria. In anticipation of this possibility, we sought to examine the relationship between qPCR-based and culture-based estimates of enterococci in surface waters. Using data from several research groups, we compared enterococci estimates by the two methods in water samples collected from 37 sites across the United States. A consistent linear pattern in the relationship between cell equivalents (CCE), based on the qPCR method, and colony-forming units (CFU), based on the traditional culturable method, was significant (P < 0.05) at most sites. A linearly decreasing variance of CCE with increasing CFU levels was significant (P < 0.05) or evident for all sites. Both marine and freshwater sites under continuous influence of point-source contamination tended to reveal a relatively constant proportion of CCE to CFU. The consistency in the mean and variance patterns of CCE versusrnCFU indicates that the relationship of results based on these two methods is more predictable at high CFU levels (e.g., log_(10)CFU > 2.0/100 mL) while uncertainty increases at lower CPU values. It was further noted that the relative error in replicated qPCR estimates was generally higher than that in replicated culture counts even at relatively high target levels, suggesting a greater need for replicated analyses in the qPCR method to reduce relative error. Further studies evaluating the relationship between culture and qPCR should take into account analytical uncertainty as well as potential differences in results of these methods that may arise from sample variability, different sources of pollution, and environmental factors.
机译:定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)方法可快速估算粪便指示剂细菌的密度,这些密度已被证明可用于评估水质。主要是因为该方法比标准的基于培养的方法提供更快的结果,因此美国环境保护局目前正在考虑将其用作修订的环境水质量标准的基础。在预期这种可能性的情况下,我们试图研究基于qPCR和基于培养物的地表水中肠球菌估计值之间的关系。使用来自多个研究小组的数据,我们比较了两种方法在从美国37个站点收集的水样中的肠球菌估计值。在大多数站点上,基于qPCR方法的细胞当量(CCE)与基于传统可培养方法的菌落形成单位(CFU)之间的关系中,线性关系一致(P <0.05)。 CCE水平随着CFU水平的增加呈线性下降,在所有部位均显着(P <0.05)或明显。在点源污染的持续影响下,海洋和淡水站点都倾向于显示CCE与CFU的比例相对恒定。 CCE与rnCFU的均值和方差模式的一致性表明,在高CFU水平下(例如log_(10)CFU> 2.0 / 100 mL),基于这两种方法的结果之间的关系更可预测,而在较低的CPU值下不确定性增加。还需要注意的是,即使在相对较高的目标水平下,重复qPCR估计值中的相对误差也通常高于重复培养物计数中的相对误差,这表明对qPCR方法中减少重复误差的重复分析的需求更大。评估培养物与qPCR之间关系的进一步研究应考虑到分析的不确定性以及这些方法结果的潜在差异,这些差异可能源于样品的变异性,不同的污染源和环境因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2010年第13期|P.5049-5064|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Lake Michigan Ecological Research Station, Great Lakes Science Center, United States Geological Survey, 1100 North Mineral Springs Road, Porter, Indiana 46304;

    rnLake Michigan Ecological Research Station, Great Lakes Science Center, United States Geological Survey, 1100 North Mineral Springs Road, Porter, Indiana 46304;

    rnLake Michigan Ecological Research Station, Great Lakes Science Center, United States Geological Survey, 1100 North Mineral Springs Road, Porter, Indiana 46304;

    rnDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305;

    rnMicrobiological and Chemical Exposure Assessment Research Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268;

    Microbiological and Chemical Exposure Assessment Research Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268;

    Lake Michigan Ecological Research Station, Great Lakes Science Center, United States Geological Survey, 1100 North Mineral Springs Road, Porter, Indiana 46304;

    rnEcosystems Research Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 960 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605;

    rnLake Michigan Ecological Research Station, Great Lakes Science Center, United States Geological Survey, 1100 North Mineral Springs Road, Porter, Indiana 46304;

    rnLake Michigan Ecological Research Station, Great Lakes Science Center, United States Geological Survey, 1100 North Mineral Springs Road, Porter, Indiana 46304;

    rnEcosystems Research Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 960 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605;

    rnEcosystems Research Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 960 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605;

    rnLake Michigan Ecological Research Station, Great Lakes Science Center, United States Geological Survey, 1100 North Mineral Springs Road, Porter, Indiana 46304;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:04:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号