首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Comparison of Five in Vitro Bioassays to Measure Estrogenic Activity in Environmental Waters
【24h】

Comparison of Five in Vitro Bioassays to Measure Estrogenic Activity in Environmental Waters

机译:五个体外生物测定法测量环境水中雌激素活性的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Bioassays are well established in the pharmaceutical industry and single compound analysis, but there is still uncertainty about their usefulness in environmental monitoring. We compared the responses of five bioassays designed to measure estrogenic activity (the yeast estrogen screen, ER-CALUX, MELN, T47D-KBluc, and E-SCREEN assays) and chemical analysis on extracts from four different water sources (groundwater, raw sewage, treated sewage, and river water). All five bioassays displayed similar trends and there was good agreement with analytical chemistry results. The data from the ER-CALUX and E-SCREEN bioassays were robust and predictable, and well-correlated with predictions from chemical analysis. The T47D-KBIuc appeared likewise promising, but with a more limited sample size it was less compelling. The YES assay was less sensitive than the other assays by an order of magnitude, which resulted in a larger number of nondetects. The MELN assay was less predictable, although the possibility that this was due to laboratory-specific difficulties cannot be discounted. With standardized bioassay data analysis and consistency of operating protocols, bioanalytical tools are a promising advance in the development of a tiered approach to environmental water quality monitoring.
机译:生物测定法在制药业和单一化合物分析中已经很成熟,但是在环境监测中其用途仍然不确定。我们比较了五种旨在测量雌激素活性的生物测定法(酵母雌激素筛查,ER-CALUX,MELN,T47D-KBluc和E-SCREEN测定)和对四种不同水源(地下水,原污水,处理过的污水和河水)。所有五种生物测定法都显示出相似的趋势,并且与分析化学结果有很好的一致性。 ER-CALUX和E-SCREEN生物测定的数据可靠且可预测,并且与化学分析的预测密切相关。 T47D-KBIuc看起来也很有希望,但样本量有限,引人注目。 YES检测的灵敏度比其他检测低一个数量级,从而导致大量未检测到。 MELN测定法的可预测性较差,尽管这是由于实验室特定困难引起的可能性无法消除。借助标准化的生物测定数据分析和操作规程的一致性,生物分析工具在开发环境水质监测的分层方法方面是一个有希望的进步。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2010年第10期|P.3853-3860|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Global Water Research Coalition, London, U.K. Griffith University, Smart Water Research Centre, Gold Coast, Australia;

    rnSchool of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa;

    rnFaculte de Pharmacie, Universite Paris Sud 11, Paris, France;

    rnDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia;

    rnKWR, Watercycle Research Institute, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands;

    rnDVGW-Technologiezentrum Wasser, Karlsruhe, Germany;

    rnLandcare Research Ltd, Lincoln, New Zealand;

    rnU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ORD, NHEERL, Reproductive Toxicology Division, Research Triangle Park, NC;

    rnGriffith University, Smart Water Research Centre, Gold Coast, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:04:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号