首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Adsorption of CO_2, CH_4, N_2O, and N_2 on MOF-5, MOF-177, and Zeolite 5A
【24h】

Adsorption of CO_2, CH_4, N_2O, and N_2 on MOF-5, MOF-177, and Zeolite 5A

机译:CO_2,CH_4,N_2O和N_2在MOF-5,MOF-177和5A沸石上的吸附

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics of CO_2, CH_4, N_2O, and N_2 on two newly discovered adsorbents, metal-organic frameworks MOF-5 and MOF-177 and one traditional adsorbent zeolite SA were determined to assess their efficacy for CO_2, CH_4. and N_2O removal from air and separation of CO_2 from CH_4 in pressure swing adsorption processes. Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics data for CO_2, CH_4, N_2O, and N_2 on all three adsorbents were measured volumetrically at 298K and gas pressures up to 800 Torr. Adsorption equilibrium capacities of CO_2 and CH_4 on all three adsorbents were determined gravimetrically at 298 K and elevated pressures (14 barfor CO_2 and 100 bar for CH,). The Henry's law and Langmuir adsorption equilibrium models were applied to correlate the adsorption isotherms, and a classical micropore diffusion model was used to analyze the adsorption kinetic data. The adsorption equilibrium selectivity was calculated from the ratio of Henry's constants, and the adsorbent selection parameter for pressure swing adsorption processes were determined by combining the equilibrium selectivity and working capacity ratio. Based on the selectivity and adsorbent selection parameter results, zeolite 5A is a better adsorbent for removing CO_2 and N_2O from air and separation of CO_2 from CH_4, whereas MOF-177 is the adsorbent of choice for removing CH, from air. However, both MOF adsorbents have larger adsorption capacities for CO_2 and CH_4 than zeolite 5A at elevated pressures, suggesting MOF-5 and MOF-177 are better adsorbents for CO_2 and CH_4 storage. The CH_4 adsorption capacity of 22 wt.% on MOF-177 at 298K and 100 bar is probably the largest adsorption uptake of CH_4 on any dry adsorbents. The average diffusivrty of CO_2, CH_4 and N_2O in MOF-5 and MOF-177 is in the order of 10~(-9) m~2/s, as compared to 10~(-11)m~2/s for CO_2, CH_4 and N_2O in zeolite 5A. The effects of gas pressure on diffusivity for different adsorabte-adsorbent systems were also investigated.
机译:确定了两种新发现的吸附剂(金属有机骨架MOF-5和MOF-177)以及一种传统的吸附型沸石SA对CO_2,CH_4,N_2O和N_2的吸附平衡和动力学,以评估其对CO_2,CH_4的功效。在变压吸附过程中从空气中去除N_2O和从CH_4中分离出CO_2。在298K和最高800 Torr的气压下,对所有三种吸附剂上的CO_2,CH_4,N_2O和N_2的吸附平衡和动力学数据进行了测量。在298 K和升高的压力下(对于CO_2为14 bar,对于CH1为100 bar),通过重量分析确定了所有三种吸附剂的CO_2和CH_4的吸附平衡容量。应用亨利定律和朗缪尔吸附平衡模型关联吸附等温线,并使用经典的微孔扩散模型分析吸附动力学数据。由亨利常数的比值计算出吸附平衡选择性,并结合平衡选择性和工作容量比确定变压吸附过程的吸附剂选择参数。根据选择性和吸附剂选择参数的结果,沸石5A是从空气中除去CO_2和N_2O以及从CH_4中分离CO_2的较好吸附剂,而MOF-177是从空气中除去CH的首选吸附剂。然而,在升高的压力下,两种MOF吸附剂均比5A沸石具有更大的CO_2和CH_4吸附能力,这表明MOF-5和MOF-177是更好的CO_2和CH_4储存吸附剂。在298K和100 bar下,MOF-177上CH_4的吸附量为22 wt。%,可能是任何干燥吸附剂上CH_4的最大吸附量。 MOF-5和MOF-177中CO_2,CH_4和N_2O的平均扩散度约为10〜(-9)m〜2 / s,而CO_2为10〜(-11)m〜2 / s ,CH_4和N_2O在5A沸石中。还研究了气体压力对不同吸附-吸附系统的扩散率的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2010年第5期|p.1820-1826|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Chemical Engineering Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003;

    rnChemical Engineering Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003 Department of Chemica and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhuu 310027 P. R. China;

    rnChemical Engineering Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003;

    rnChemical Engineering Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号