首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Assessment of DDT Relative Bioavailability and Bioaccessibility in Historically Contaminated Soils Using an in Vivo Mouse Model and Fed and Unfed Batch in Vitro Assays
【24h】

Assessment of DDT Relative Bioavailability and Bioaccessibility in Historically Contaminated Soils Using an in Vivo Mouse Model and Fed and Unfed Batch in Vitro Assays

机译:使用体内小鼠模型以及喂食和未喂食的体外测定法评估历史受污染土壤中DDT的相对生物利用度和生物利用度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, DDTr (DDTr = DDT + DDD + DDE) relative bioavailability in historically contaminated soils (n = 7) was assessed using an in vivo mouse model. Soils or reference materials were administered to mice daily over a 7 day exposure period with bioavailability determined using DDTr accumulation in adipose, kidney, or liver tissues. Depending on the target tissue used for its calculation, some variability in DDTr relative bioavailability was observed; however, it did not exceed 25% (range 2-25%). When DDTr bioaccessibility was determined using organic physiologically based extraction test (Org-PBET), unified BARGE method (UBM), and fed organic estimation human simulation test (FOREhST) in vitro assays, bioaccessibility was less than 4% irrespective of the assay utilized and the concentration of DDTr in the contaminated soil. Pearson correlations demonstrate a poor relationship between DDTr relative bioavailability and DDTr bioaccessibility (0.47, 0.38, and 0.28, respectively), illustrating the limitations of the static in vitro methods for predicting the dynamic processes of the mammalian digestive system for this hydrophobic organic contaminant.
机译:在这项研究中,使用体内小鼠模型评估了历史污染土壤(n = 7)中的DDTr(DDTr = DDT + DDD + DDE)相对生物利用度。在暴露的7天中每天向小鼠施用土壤或参考物质,并利用在脂肪,肾脏或肝脏组织中的DDTr积累来确定其生物利用度。根据用于计算的目标组织,观察到DDTr相对生物利用度存在一定差异。但是,它不超过25%(范围2-25%)。使用体外基于生理学的提取试验(Org-PBET),统一的BARGE方法(UBM)和有机评估人类模拟试验(FOREhST)测定DDTr的生物可及性时,无论采用何种测定方法和方法,生物可及性均低于4%。污染土壤中DDTr的浓度。皮尔逊相关性表明DDTr相对生物利用度与DDTr生物利用度之间的关系不佳(分别为0.47、0.38和0.28),这说明了静态体外方法预测这种疏水性有机污染物的哺乳动物消化系统动态过程的局限性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2012年第5期|p.2928-2934|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia,Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia;

    Centre for Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia,Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia;

    Veterinary Services Division, Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Gilles Plains, SA 5086, Australia;

    Veterinary Services Division, Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Gilles Plains, SA 5086, Australia;

    Centre for Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia,Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia;

    Centre for Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia,Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:02:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号