...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Longitudinal Effects of a Sanitation Intervention on Environmental Fecal Contamination in a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Bangladesh
【24h】

Longitudinal Effects of a Sanitation Intervention on Environmental Fecal Contamination in a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Bangladesh

机译:卫生干预对孟加拉国农村集群随机对照试验中环境粪便污染的纵向影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Household latrine access generally is not associated with reduced fecal contamination in the environment, but its long-term effectiveness has not been measured. We conducted an environmental assessment nested within the WASH Benefits Bangladesh randomized controlled trial (NCT01590095). We quantified E. coli and fecal coliforms in samples of stored drinking water, child hands, mother hands, soil, and food among a random sample of households from the sanitation and control arms of the trial. Samples were collected during eight quarterly visits approximately 1-3.5 years after intervention initiation. Overall, there were no substantial differences in environmental fecal contamination between households enrolled in the sanitation and control arms. Statistically significant reductions were found in stored water and child hands after pooling across sampling rounds, but the effects were small and not consistent across rounds. In addition, we assessed potential effect modification of intervention effects by follow-up time, season, wealth, community-level latrine density and coverage, population density, and domestic animal ownership. While the intervention had statistically significant effects within some subgroups, there were no consistent patterns of effect modification. Our findings support a growing consensus that on-site latrines are insufficient to prevent fecal contamination in the rural household environment.
机译:家庭厕所访问通常与环境中的粪便污染降低无关,但尚未测量其长期效率。我们在洗涤福利孟加拉国随机对照试验(NCT01590095)中进行了环境评估。我们在储存的饮用水,儿童手,母亲,手,土壤样本中量化了大肠杆菌和粪便大肠菌,以及来自卫生和控制武器的家庭随机样本的家庭中的家庭。在干预启动后八季度访问期间收集样品约1-3.5季度。总体而言,纳入卫生和控制武器的家庭之间的环境粪便污染没有大量差异。在汇集循环回合后,在储存的水和儿童手中发现了统计学上的减少,但效果小而且在圆形上不一致。此外,我们通过随访时间,季节,财富,社区水平的厕所密度和覆盖,人口密度和国内动物所有权评估了对干预效果的潜在影响改变。虽然干预在某些亚组内具有统计学意义的效果,但没有一致的效果改性模式。我们的调查结果支持越来越多的共识,即现场的厕所不足以防止农村家庭环境中的粪便污染。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2021年第12期|8169-8179|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina 27695 United States;

    Environmental Interventions Unit Infectious Disease Division International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh Dhaka 1212 Bangladesh;

    Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health University of California Berkeley California 94720 United States;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Berkeley California 94720 United States;

    Woods Institute for the Environment Stanford University Stanford California 94305 United States;

    Francis I. Proctor Foundation University of California San Francisco California 94143 United States;

    Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health University of California Berkeley California 94720 United States;

    Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health University of California Berkeley California 94720 United States;

    Environmental Interventions Unit Infectious Disease Division International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh Dhaka 1212 Bangladesh;

    Environmental Interventions Unit Infectious Disease Division International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh Dhaka 1212 Bangladesh;

    Environmental Interventions Unit Infectious Disease Division International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh Dhaka 1212 Bangladesh;

    Environmental Interventions Unit Infectious Disease Division International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh Dhaka 1212 Bangladesh;

    Environmental Interventions Unit Infectious Disease Division International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh Dhaka 1212 Bangladesh;

    Woods Institute for the Environment Stanford University Stanford California 94305 United States;

    Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health University of California Berkeley California 94720 United States;

    Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina 27695 United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    latrine; potty; child feccs management; WASH; fecal indicator bacteria; E. coli; disease transmission pathways; environmental sampling;

    机译:厕所;便壶;儿童FECCS管理;洗;粪便指标细菌;大肠杆菌;疾病传输途径;环境抽样;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号