首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Additional Emissions and Cost from Storing Electricity in Stationary Battery Systems
【24h】

Additional Emissions and Cost from Storing Electricity in Stationary Battery Systems

机译:固定电池系统中储电带来的额外排放和成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Stationary batteries are an important technological option for renewable energy-based decarbonization of the electricity sector, as they can counterbalance renewable energy sources' intermittency and provide grid-stabilizing services. However, it has been argued that the additional economic cost of batteries, emissions occurring during the manufacturing phase of batteries, and emissions caused by losses during the use phase can reduce batteries' potential in supporting the decarbonization of the electricity sector. Here, we perform a new battery production- and use-phase lifecycle emissions and cost analysis to calculate the additional lifecycle greenhoues gas (GHG) emissions (LCE) and costs (LCC) that arise from storing electricity in six different battery technologies, five applications, and three different geographies. Our results show that the LCE of storing electricity are strongly determined by application and geography, whereas LCC vary with application and technology. Lithium-ion technologies perform best across most applications and geographies on both the LCE and LCC dimensions. Furthermore, we only identify trade-offs between the LCC and the GHG emissions cost when assuming a high social cost of GHG emissions of 180 EUR/tonCO(2)e. Based on our results, we discuss which dimensions of technological improvement of battery technologies are most desirable from a societal perspective.
机译:固定式电池是电力部门基于可再生能源的脱碳的重要技术选择,因为它们可以平衡可再生能源的间歇性并提供稳定电网的服务。但是,已经有人提出,电池的额外经济成本,在电池制造阶段产生的排放以及在使用阶段由损耗引起的排放会降低电池支持电力部门脱碳的潜力。在这里,我们执行新的电池生产和使用阶段的生命周期排放和成本分析,以计算通过在六种不同的电池技术,五种应用中存储电能而产生的额外生命周期绿色气体(GHG)排放(LCE)和成本(LCC) ,以及三个不同的地理位置。我们的结果表明,储能的生命周期成本很大程度上取决于应用程序和地理位置,而生命周期成本则随应用程序和技术而变化。在LCE和LCC尺寸上,锂离子技术在大多数应用和地区中均表现最佳。此外,当假设温室气体排放的社会成本高达180欧元/吨CO(2)e时,我们仅在LCC和温室气体排放成本之间进行权衡。根据我们的研究结果,我们从社会角度讨论了最需要电池技术改进的哪些方面。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2019年第7期|3379-3390|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Energy Polit Grp, Haldeneggsteig 4, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland;

    Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Energy Polit Grp, Haldeneggsteig 4, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland;

    Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Energy Syst Anal, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland;

    Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Energy Polit Grp, Haldeneggsteig 4, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland;

    Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Energy Syst Anal, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland|Paul Scherrer Inst, Electrochem Lab, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland;

    Univ Geneva, Inst Environm Sci, Energy Efficiency Grp, Blvd Carl Vogt 66, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland|Univ Geneva, Forel Inst, Blvd Carl Vogt 66, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland;

    Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Energy Syst Anal, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland;

    Univ Geneva, Inst Environm Sci, Energy Efficiency Grp, Blvd Carl Vogt 66, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland|Univ Geneva, Forel Inst, Blvd Carl Vogt 66, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号