首页> 外文期刊>Environmental research >Microbial quality of wild shellfish in a tropical estuary subject to treated effluent discharge
【24h】

Microbial quality of wild shellfish in a tropical estuary subject to treated effluent discharge

机译:在热带河口的野生贝类微生物质量受处理的污水放电

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Elevated faecal indicator levels in beaches around Darwin Harbour including near effluent outfalls have led to concerns about the safety of popular, locally harvested aquatic foods. To address these concerns, the impact of treated effluent discharge on the microbial quality of aquatic foods was assessed using culture-based and molecular tools. Seawater, shellfish (mangrove snails Telescopium and Nerita balteata, the local black lip oyster Saccostrea cucullata) and mud crabs (Scylla serrata) were collected from 13 sites close (impacted) and distal (reference) to two effluent discharge locations, in creeks and coastal areas. Sampling occurred over two dry seasons and one wet season. E. coli, typical sewage related pathogens, Salmonella and norovirus, and the molecular faecal marker Bacteroides, as well as naturally occurring marine bacteria, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus were tested in biota. E. coli and faecal coliforms were measured in water in water. The highest concentration of faecal coliforms in water was from the Buffalo Creek discharge site. At sites located in creeks including reference creeks, the highest concentrations of faecal coliforms in water were measured in the wet season compared to the dry season, whereas in coastal sites, no or only few (< 10) faecal coliforms were detected. E. coli concentrations in both snail species were significantly higher in the wet season compared to the dry season (P < 0.0001) at both the treated effluent discharge sites and reference sites with some samples exceeding the acceptable Australian and New Zealand Food Standards (ANZFS) level based on £. coil levels in bivalves. E. coli concentrations in all of the S. cucullata samples were either below the detection limit or below the ANZFS limit for E. coli. No E. coli exceedances occurred in cooked mud crabs although low E. coli levels were measured in 3 cooked mud crab samples. Only one shellfish sample (T. telescopium) was positive for Salmonella. Norovirus and Bacteroides were not detected in any of the shellfish samples tested. V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus were significantly more prevalent in shellfish samples during the wet season. Twelve virulent strains of V. parahaemolyticus were detected in T. telescopium and two in N. balteata. There was no significant difference in V. parahaemolyticus prevalence between sites. V. parahaemolyticus was detected in cooked S. serrata samples from three sites in the wet season and once in the 2016 dry season. V. vulnificus was detected in both T. telescopium and N. balteata, but not in any of the S. cucullata samples. One cooked crab meat sample from a reference site was positive for V. vulnificus. The prevalence of V. vulnificus was significantly higher at the reference sites compared to the discharge or potential impact sites. The lack of correlation between E. coli and targeted faecal pathogens in biota confirm that traditional faecal markers are not suitable surrogates for faecal pollution, at least not in the tropics. The higher prevalence of E. coli, V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus in biota during the wet season compared to the dry season irrespective of treated sewage influence suggests that marine snails should not be harvested and consumed from creeks during the wet season. Any future aquaculture involving shellfish should consider these data when developing appropriate shellfish quality assurance protocols and for making decisions on where to situate farms.
机译:达尔文港周围的海滩上的粪便指标水平较高,包括近污水排污面的近期导致对流行,局部收获的水生食品的安全性担忧。为了解决这些问题,使用培养基和分子工具评估治疗流出物放电对水生食物微生物食品的影响。海水,贝类(红树林蜗牛伸缩和人田巴尔托卡,当地黑唇羊牡蛎Saccostrea cucullata)和泥蟹(Scylla serrata)从13个点关闭(撞击)和远端(参考)到两个污水排放位置,在小溪和沿海地区地区。取样发生在两个干季和一个潮湿的季节。大肠杆菌,典型的污水处理病原体,沙门氏菌和诺维病毒以及分子粪便标志物,以及天然存在的海洋细菌,在Biota测试了vibrio parahaemolyticus和vibrio pulnfificus。在水中测量大肠杆菌和粪群大肠菌。水中的最高浓度的水大肠在水中是来自水牛溪排放场所。在位于Creeks的遗址包括参考溪流,与旱季相比,在湿季节测量水中的最高浓度的粪便大肠杆菌,而在沿海地点,没有或仅少数(<10)粪群。湿季节的大肠杆菌浓度在治疗的污水排放场所和参考地点的干燥季节(P <0.0001)相比,湿季节明显高于,其中一些样品超过可接受的澳大利亚和新西兰食品标准(ANZF)基于£的水平。叶片水平在二气位。在所有S.Cucullata样品中的大肠杆菌浓度低于检测极限或低于大肠杆菌的ANZFS限制。虽然在3个煮熟的泥蟹样品中测量了低大肠杆菌水平,但在煮熟的泥浆蟹中没有大肠杆菌超标。只有一个贝类样品(T. telescopium)对沙门氏菌呈阳性。在测试的任何贝类样品中未检测到诺维病毒和菌骨。五,帕拉香溶血和V.Vulnificus在潮湿的季节贝类样品中显着普遍。在T. Telescopium和2 in N.Balteata中检测到12株V.Varahaemolyticus的V.Varahaemolyticus。遗址V.副乙酰氨次普遍差异没有显着差异。 V.在湿季节的三个地点煮熟的S.Searrata样本中检测到副磷酸溶血溶液。 V. vulnificus在T. Telescopium和N.Balteata中检测到,但不在任何S. Cucullata样本中。来自参考网站的一个熟蟹肉样品对于V.Vulnificus是阳性的。与放电或潜在的冲击部位相比,参考点的V.Vulnificus的患病率显着高。 Biota中大肠杆菌和靶向粪便病原体之间缺乏相关性证实,传统的粪便标志物不适合粪便污染的替代品,至少不是在热带地区。与干燥季节相比,湿季的大肠杆菌,V.Parahaemolyticus和V.Vulnificus的普遍率较高。无论治疗的污水影响如何,都应该在潮湿的季节收获和消费海洋蜗牛。任何涉及贝类的未来水产养殖应在制定适当的贝类质量保证议定书时考虑这些数据,并在何处决定占地农场。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental research》 |2020年第2期|108921.1-108921.10|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Research Institute of the Environment and Livelihoods Charles Darwin University Darwin Northern Territory 0909 Australia;

    Power Water Corporation Water Services P.O. Box 37471 Winnellie Northern Territory 0821 Australia;

    Power Water Corporation Water Services P.O. Box 37471 Winnellie Northern Territory 0821 Australia;

    Research Institute of the Environment and Livelihoods Charles Darwin University Darwin Northern Territory 0909 Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Shellfish; Pathogens; Faecal indicators; Effluent; Vibrio;

    机译:贝类;病原体;粪便指标;流出物;颤音;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号