...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Pollution >Long-term exposure to traffic noise and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence between 2000 and 2020
【24h】

Long-term exposure to traffic noise and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence between 2000 and 2020

机译:长期暴露于交通噪音和死亡率:2000年至2020年间流行病学证据的系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We aimed to update the evidence-base of long-term noise exposures from road, rail, and aircraft traffic on both non-accidental and cardiovascular mortality.A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The literature was searched using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE for the period between January 01, 2000 and October 05, 2020. 13 studies were selected for final review. The risk of bias and overall quality of evidence was evaluated using a pre-defined list of criteria. Risk estimates from each study were converted into per 10 dB higher of L-d(en) for each traffic source. Inverse-Variance heterogeneity (I-Vhet) meta-analysis was used to pool these individual risk estimates, along with assessment of heterogeneity and publication bias. Sensitivity analyses include using random-effect model and leave-one-out meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses by study design and noise exposure assessment were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.For road traffic, the pooled relative risk (RR) per 10 dB higher L-d(en) for mortality from non-accidental causes was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.05) (5 studies, I-2 = 78%), CVD was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.05) (5 studies, I-2 = 41%), ischemic heart disease (IHD) was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.08) (7 studies, I-2 = 46%), and stroke was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.14) (5 studies, I-2 = 62%). The overall quality of evidence for most meta-analyses was rated as very low to low, except for CVD or IHD mortality, for which the quality of evidence was rated as moderate. A possible threshold of 53 dB was visually suggested for CVD-related mortality from road traffic noise in the trend analysis. For aircraft noise, pooled estimates were based on fewer studies and varied by mortality outcomes.Evidence of long-term exposure to traffic noise on mortality remains weak except the association between road traffic noise and IHD mortality. High-quality longitudinal studies are required to better characterise mortality effects of traffic noise. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:我们的旨在更新来自道路,铁路和飞机交通的长期噪音曝光的证据基础,既不意外和心血管死亡率则进行系统审查和荟萃分析。使用PubMed,Scopus,Science Web进行搜索的文献,并在2000年1月01日和05年10月5日之间进行了Embase,选择了13项研究进行最终审查。使用预定义的标准列表评估偏见的风险和总体证据质量。每项研究的风险估算将在每个交通源的L-D(EN)上转换为每10 dB。反方差异质性(I-VHET)Meta分析用于汇集这些个体风险估计,以及对异质性和出版物偏差的评估。敏感性分析包括使用随机效应模型和休留次级分析。通过研究设计和噪声暴露评估进行亚组分析,以探讨异质性的潜在来源。对于道路交通,来自非意外原因的死亡率的每10 dB的汇集相对风险(RR)为1.01(95%CI :0.98,1.05)(5研究,I-2 = 78%),CVD为1.01(95%CI:0.98,1.05)(5研究,I-2 = 41%),缺血性心脏病(IHD)为1.03( 95%CI:0.99,1.08)(7研究,I-2 = 46%)和中风为1.05(95%CI:0.97,114)(5研究,I-2 = 62%)。除了CVD或IHD死亡率外,大多数荟萃分析的总证据质量被评为低至低,证据质量评定为中等。目视提出53dB的可能阈值,以趋势分析中的道路交通噪声与CVD相关的死亡率。对于飞机噪声,汇总的估计基于更少的研究,并因死亡率结果而变化。除了道路交通噪声和IHD死亡率之间的关联之外,长期暴露于对数量的交通噪音仍然很弱。需要高质量的纵向研究以更好地表征交通噪音的死亡率。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Pollution》 |2021年第1期|116222.1-116222.11|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Oxford Nuffield Dept Womens & Reprod Hlth Oxford England|Univ Oxford Deep Med Programme Oxford Martin Sch Oxford England;

    Univ Oxford Nuffield Dept Womens & Reprod Hlth Oxford England|Univ Oxford Deep Med Programme Oxford Martin Sch Oxford England;

    Univ Oxford Nuffield Dept Womens & Reprod Hlth Oxford England|Univ Oxford Deep Med Programme Oxford Martin Sch Oxford England;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Noise exposure; Transportation; Death; Fatality; Cardiovascular disease;

    机译:噪音曝光;运输;死亡;致命;心血管疾病;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号