首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Politics >Regulatory thickening and the politics of market-oriented environmental policy
【24h】

Regulatory thickening and the politics of market-oriented environmental policy

机译:监管增厚与市场环境政策的政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Scholars of environmental market-based policy instruments (MBIs), such as cap-and-trade and biodiversity offsetting programs, have extensively documented MBI's market-like features, including the ways they incentivize producing environmental quality, risk subordinating nature protection to capital accumulation, and are supported by state-driven projects of market-building ('re-regulation'). A less emphasized dimension of MBIs is examined: the ways these institutions are founded upon a substantial thickening of state infrastructural power, which amounts to expanding state control over economic and environmental life in ways that outstrip processes of re-regulation. Appreciating the linkages between MBIs and expanding state control over environmental quality may help explain routine conservative resistance to these policy developments. Affinities between MBIs and regulatory thickening also call into question the degree to which MBIs should be thought of as 'liberalizing' policy instruments and suggests that, perhaps counterintuitively, the growth of MBIs may present new opportunities for expanding public control over environmental quality.
机译:基于环境市场的政策文书(MBIS)的学者,如关于贸易和生物多样性的抵消计划,广泛地记录了MBI的类似市场的特征,包括他们激励生产环境质量的方式,风险下属的自然保护到资本积累,并由国家驱动的市场建设项目('重新调控')支持。审查了较强调的MBIS维度:这些机构在国家基础设施权力大幅增厚方面取得了成立的方式,这使得在重新调控的过程中扩大国家对经济和环境生活的影响。欣赏MBIS之间的联系和扩大国家对环境质量的控制可能有助于解释对这些政策发展的常规保守抵抗。 MBIS与监管增厚之间的亲和力也称为MBIS应该被视为“自由化”政策工具的程度,并表明,也许是违反直接来说,MBI的增长可能会为扩大公众控制环境质量的新机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号