首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Politics >Who shapes local climate policy? Unpicking governance arrangements in English and German cities
【24h】

Who shapes local climate policy? Unpicking governance arrangements in English and German cities

机译:谁制定当地的气候政策?英国和德国城市的治理安排不完善

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A new framework for analysing subnational policymaking is applied to climate governance in the 'twin towns' of Newcastle upon Tyne and Gelsenkirchen. Low levels of resource interdependence between central and local government in England mean that Newcastle Council has to rely heavily on other horizontal actors to achieve its climate objectives. In contrast, Gelsenkirchen Council receives substantial support from higher tiers of government, which gives it greater control over policymaking within the locality. Greater independence between tiers of government can make it more difficult for subnational bodies to adopt the kind of ambitious policies that may be necessary to combat wicked and/or significant policy challenges such as climate change. Instead, interdependent 'joint-decision' systems, which facilitate mutual support across tiers of government, may be better equipped to ensure that subnational public bodies have the capacity to act appropriately.
机译:在泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔和盖尔森基兴的“双城”中,将分析地方决策的新框架应用于气候治理。英格兰中央政府与地方政府之间资源依赖程度低,这意味着纽卡斯尔议会必须严重依赖其他横向参与者来实现其气候目标。相比之下,盖尔森基兴议会获得了上级政府的大力支持,这使其可以更好地控制当地的决策。各级政府之间的更大独立性可能会使地方机构更难以采取雄心勃勃的政策,以应对邪恶和/或重大的政策挑战,例如气候变化。取而代之的是,相互依存的“联合决策”系统可以促进各级政府之间的相互支持,从而更好地确保地方公共机构具有采取适当行动的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号