...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Politics >Business as a regulatory leader for risk governance? The compact initiative for liability and redress under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
【24h】

Business as a regulatory leader for risk governance? The compact initiative for liability and redress under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

机译:作为风险管理的监管领导者有生意吗? 《卡塔赫纳生物安全议定书》规定的赔偿责任和补救协定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In March 2008, the six world leading agro-biotechnology companies, presented a private, international instrument for liability and redress to cover the environmental damage caused by genetically modified organisms. The proposal was rejected by governments, who instead adopted a binding supplementary liability and redress protocol to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, with no content transfer from the business initiative. Elaborating on this case study, it is explained how powerful business proposals can turn into a policy failure. Business conflicts are identified as one major explanatory factor. The fragmentation of business interests and the lack of business support for the six major firms' initiative have discredited the role of corporations as regulatory leaders. Business unity is found to be a decisive, necessary condition for the endorsement of corporate proposals by policymakers.
机译:2008年3月,六家世界领先的农业生物技术公司提出了一项私人的国际责任和补救工具,以涵盖转基因生物造成的环境损害。该提案遭到各国政府的拒绝,各国政府改为对《卡塔赫纳生物安全议定书》采用了具有约束力的补充责任和补救协议,而没有从业务计划中转移任何内容。在此案例研究的基础上,将解释强大的业务建议如何导致策略失败。业务冲突被认为是主要的解释性因素。商业利益的分散和对这六家主要公司的倡议缺乏业务支持,削弱了公司作为监管领导者的作用。发现业务统一是决策者认可公司提议的决定性必要条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号