...
首页> 外文期刊>European environment >Learning from Experiences in Adaptive Action Research: a Critical Comparison of two Case Studies Applying Participatory Scenario Development and Modelling Approaches
【24h】

Learning from Experiences in Adaptive Action Research: a Critical Comparison of two Case Studies Applying Participatory Scenario Development and Modelling Approaches

机译:从适应性行动研究的经验中学习:两个采用参与式情景发展和建模方法的案例研究的批判性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper contributes to the emerging debate on participatory modelling at the core of adaptive action research. We compare and reflect upon lessons learned from two projects in very different bio-physical and socio-economic contexts, the UK and Nicaragua, and outline a shared theoretical and methodological framework to assist researchers and local stakeholders to jointly assess, monitor and adapt to climatic and other changes. We discuss opportunities and obstacles, specifically: (i) incorporating uncertainty and surprises; (2) combining epis-temologies; (3) dealing with representativeness and power dynamics; (4) creating opportunities for improving stakeholders' agency; and (5) facilitating dialogue and negotiation by using models as heuristics. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of dealing with unavoidable trade-offs when engaging in participatory and interdisciplinary research in complex and uncertain decision-making contexts. The participatory modelling experiences show that stakeholders' involvement throughout the process, epistemological plurality, flexibility and sensitivity to context-dependent socio-cultural processes need to be considered by researchers who wish to enhance the adaptive capacity of the communities they work with. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
机译:本文为适应性行动研究的核心问题-参与式建模的新兴辩论做出了贡献。我们比较并回顾了从两个项目中在非常不同的生物物理和社会经济背景下(英国和尼加拉瓜)汲取的经验教训,并概述了共享的理论和方法框架,以协助研究人员和当地利益相关者共同评估,监测和适应气候变化和其他更改。我们将讨论机遇和障碍,特别是:(i)纳入不确定性和惊喜; (2)结合认识论; (3)处理代表性和权力动态; (4)为改善利益相关者的代理创造机会; (5)以模型为试探法,促进对话与谈判。我们的分析强调了在复杂而不确定的决策环境中参与参与式和跨学科研究时,必须避免不可避免的折衷。参与式建模经验表明,研究人员需要考虑利益相关者在整个过程中的参与,认识论的多元性,对上下文相关的社会文化过程的灵活性和敏感性,这些研究者希望提高与他们合作的社区的适应能力。版权所有©2011 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd和ERP Environment。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European environment》 |2011年第6期|p.433-453|共21页
  • 作者单位

    Institute for Environmental Sciences and Technologies (ICTA), Universitat Autbnoma de Barcelona,Bellaterra, Spain,Associate of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, School of Earth of Environment University of Leeds LEEDS LS2 g/T, UK;

    Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, USA;

    Aberdeen Centre for Environmental Sustainability and Centre for Planning and Environmental Management, School of Ceosciences, University of Aberdeen, UK;

    Associate of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, School of Earth of Environment University of Leeds LEEDS LS2 g/T, UK,Centrefor Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), Unit of Ecology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    adaptive action-research; iterative learning; nicaragua; participatory modelling; scenario analysis; UK;

    机译:适应性行动研究迭代学习;尼加拉瓜参与式建模;情景分析;英国;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号