首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and planning law journal >Should a general 'duty of care' for the environment become a centerpiece of a 'next generation' environment protection statute?
【24h】

Should a general 'duty of care' for the environment become a centerpiece of a 'next generation' environment protection statute?

机译:一般的环境保护“义务”是否应成为“下一代”环境保护法规的核心?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article argues that there is considerable merit in the introduction of a general duty of care for the environment in jurisdictions which have not so far embraced this concept. As with work health and safety legislation, such a duty would establish the broad goals of the law, providing unifying themes that clarify the intentions of the law. A particular virtue is its all-encompassing character: providing a broad standard of care that can be applied to fit any set of facts. As such, it would provide a valuable framework within which duty-holders must operate, which will be particularly important where no more practical guidance is available from other sources. The broad scope of the duty also means that it does not date quickly and that it provides considerable flexibility for the duty-holder to determine the action to take to suit their operations. The South Australian experience shows that a duty of care, if fully embraced by the regulator, can be an important component of the regulatory toolkit. However, other Australian jurisdictions provide for a more limited (and so less controversial) form of the general duty, in which it operates primarily as a defence, and where the remedies for breach are administrative, not criminal. This article argues that there is a case for going one step further and imposing criminal liability, a proposal that is being contemplated in Victoria at the time of writing.
机译:本文认为,在迄今尚未接受这一概念的司法管辖区中,引入对环境的一般保护义务具有相当大的好处。与工作健康和安全立法一样,此项职责将确立法律的广泛目标,提供统一的主题,阐明法律的意图。一种特殊的优点是其无所不包的特征:提供广泛的护理标准,可以适用于任何事实。这样,它将提供一个有价值的框架,责任人必须在其中运作,如果没有其他来源的实际指导,这将尤其重要。职责范围广泛,这也意味着它不会很快过时,并且为责任人确定适合其业务的行动提供了很大的灵活性。南澳大利亚州的经验表明,如果监管机构充分履行谨慎义务,那么它可能是监管工具包的重要组成部分。但是,澳大利亚的其他司法管辖区则规定了一种较为有限(因此争议较少)的一般职责形式,该职责主要是为辩护而运作,并且针对违反行为的补救措施是行政性的,而不是刑事性的。本文认为,有必要进一步采取措施并施加刑事责任,在撰写本文时,维多利亚州正在考虑一项提议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号