首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment >Evaluation of microbiological air quality and of microclimate in university classrooms
【24h】

Evaluation of microbiological air quality and of microclimate in university classrooms

机译:大学教室中微生物空气质量和小气候的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The proliferation of air-diffused microorganisms inside public buildings such as schools, hospitals, and universities, is often indicated as a possible health risk. In this research, we have illustrated the results of an investigation realized to determine the health of the air in some university classrooms, both from a microbiological and a microclimatic viewpoint, during the normal didactic activity of direct lessons. The results obtained have been expressed by means of contamination indices, already used in previous works. Very little contamination was recorded in the different phases of air treatment, which underlines the efficiency of the system and of the maintenance protocols. The Global Index of Microbial Contamination (GIMC per cubic meter) showed a value greater than the mean during the heating period (290), while the highest values (95th percentile 1,138.45) were recorded in the period using air conditioning. The index of mesophilic bacterial contamination, though it did not show any significant differences in the various modes of air treatment, showed a mean value (1.34) and the 95th percentile value (4.14), which was greater in the air-conditioning phase. Finally, the mean value of the amplification index underlined a decrease in the microbial contamination in comparison to the outside, while showing situations of increased microbial amplification during the period of simple ventilation (95th percentile 4.27). The 95th percentile values found for GICM in the three sampling periods, however, permitted us to identify the value of GIMC per cubic meter equal to 1,000 as a guide to provide a means of self-monitoring the quality of the air inside the classrooms. From a microclimatic viewpoint, two periods of the year manifested discomfort situations: during the heating phase (winter) and during the simple ventilation phase (spring). The results obtained indicate, therefore, a need to intervene on the environmental parameters, not being able, in this particular case, to intervene on other aspects that influence the microclimate.
机译:空气扩散的微生物在学校,医院和大学等公共建筑内的扩散通常被认为是可能的健康风险。在这项研究中,我们举例说明了在直接课程的正常教学活动中,从微生物学和微气候的角度确定某些大学教室中空气健康状况的调查结果。所获得的结果已经通过先前工作中已经使用的污染指数来表示。在空气处理的不同阶段几乎没有污染记录,这突出了系统和维护协议的效率。全球微生物污染指数(每立方米GIMC)显示的值大于加热期间的平均值(290),而在此期间使用空调记录的最高值(第95个百分位数1,138.45)。尽管中温细菌污染指数在各种空气处理方式中均未显示任何显着差异,但其平均值(1.34)和第95个百分位数(4.14)在空调阶段更高。最后,放大指数的平均值强调了与外界相比微生物污染的减少,同时显示了在简单通风期间微生物放大增加的情况(95%4.27)。然而,在三个采样周期中GICM的第95个百分位数值使我们能够确定每立方米GIMC的值等于1,000,以此作为指导以提供一种自我监控教室内空气质量的方法。从小气候角度来看,一年中有两个时期出现不适情况:在采暖阶段(冬季)和在简单通风阶段(春季)。因此,获得的结果表明需要干预环境参数,在这种特殊情况下,不能干预影响微气候的其他方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号