首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Modelling & Software >Parameterization of a process-based tree-growth model: Comparison of optimization, MCMC and Particle Filtering algorithms
【24h】

Parameterization of a process-based tree-growth model: Comparison of optimization, MCMC and Particle Filtering algorithms

机译:基于过程的树增长模型的参数化:优化,MCMC和粒子滤波算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Finely tuned process-based tree-growth models are of considerable help in understanding the variations of biomass increments measured in the dendrochronological series. Using site and species parameters, as well as daily climate variables, the MAIDEN model computes the water balance at ecosystem level and the daily increment of carbon storage in the stem through photosynthesis processes to reproduce the structure of the tree-ring series. In this paper, we use three techniques to calibrate this model with Pinus halepensis data sampled in the Mediterranean part of France: a standard optimization (PEST), Monte Carlo Markov Chains (MCMC) and Particle Filtering (PF). Contrary to PEST, which tries to find an optimum fit (giving the lowest error between observations and simulations), the principle of MCMC and PF is to walk, from a priori distributions, in the parameter space according to particular statistical rules to compute each parameter distribution. The PEST and MCMC calibrations of our dendrochronological series lead to rather similar adjustments between simulations and observations. PF and MCMC calibrations give different parameter distributions, showing how complementary are these methods, with a better fit for MCMC. Yet, independent validations over 11 independent meteorological years show a higher efficiency of the recent PF method over the others.
机译:精细调整的基于过程的树生长模型对于理解树木年代序列中测得的生物量增量的变化有很大帮助。利用场地和物种参数以及每日气候变量,MAIDEN模型通过光合作用过程计算生态系统水平的水平衡和茎中碳储量的每日增量,以再现树轮系列的结构。在本文中,我们使用三种技术用法国地中海地区采样的樟子松数据校准该模型:标准优化(PEST),蒙特卡洛马尔可夫链(MCMC)和粒子滤波(PF)。与PEST相反,PEST试图找到最佳拟合(观察和模拟之间的误差最小),MCMC和PF的原理是根据特定的统计规则从先验分布中移入参数空间以计算每个参数分配。我们的树木年代学系列的PEST和MCMC校准导致模拟和观测之间的调整非常相似。 PF和MCMC校准提供了不同的参数分布,显示了这些方法的互补性,更适合MCMC。但是,在11个独立的气象年中进行的独立验证表明,最新的PF方法比其他方法具有更高的效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号