首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Forb, Insect, and Soil Response to Burning and Mowing Wyoming Big Sagebrush in Greater Sage-Grouse Breeding Habitat
【24h】

Forb, Insect, and Soil Response to Burning and Mowing Wyoming Big Sagebrush in Greater Sage-Grouse Breeding Habitat

机译:鼠尾草,昆虫和土壤对大鼠尾草繁殖栖息地怀俄明大鼠尾草的燃烧和割草的响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis A. t. Nutt. ssp. wyomingensis Beetle and Young) communities provide structure and forbs and insects needed by greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus ur-ophasianus) for growth and survival. We evaluated forb, insect, and soil responses at six mowed and 19 prescribed burned sites compared to 25, paired and untreated reference sites. Sites were classified by treatment type, soil type, season, and decade of treatment (sites burned during 1990-1999 and sites burned or mowed during 2000-2006). Our objective was to evaluate differences in ten habitat attributes known to influence sage-grouse nesting and brood rearing to compare responses among treatment scenarios. Contrary to desired outcomes, treating Wyoming big sagebrush through prescribed burning or mowing may not stimulate cover or increase nutrition in food forbs, or increase insect abundance or indicators of soil quality compared with reference sites. In some cases, prescribed burning showed positive results compared with mowing such as greater forb crude protein content (%), ant (Hymenoptera; no./trap), beetle (Coleopterao./trap), and grasshopper abundance (Orthoptera; no./sweep), and total (%) soil carbon and nitrogen, but of these attributes, only grasshopper abundance was enhanced at burned sites compared with reference sites in 2008. Mowing did not promote a statistically significant increase in sage-grouse nesting or early brood-rearing habitat attributes such as cover or nutritional quality of food forbs, or counts of ants, beetles, or grasshoppers compared with reference sites.
机译:怀俄明州的大型鼠尾草(Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis A. t。Nutt。ssp。wyomingensis Beetle and Young)群落提供了更大的鼠尾草(Centrocercus ur-ophasianus)生长和生存所需的结构,前叉和昆虫。我们评估了6个割草和19个指定烧伤部位的Forb,昆虫和土壤反应,而25个成对和未处理的参考部位则进行了评估。根据处理类型,土壤类型,季节和处理十年对场地进行分类(1990-1999年期间焚烧的场地以及2000-2006年期间焚烧或割草的场地)。我们的目的是评估已知影响鼠尾草巢和巢育育的十个栖息地属性的差异,以比较治疗方案之间的反应。与预期结果相反,与参考点相比,通过规定的焚烧或割草方式处理怀俄明州的大型鼠尾草可能不会刺激覆盖食物或增加食物中的营养,也不会增加昆虫的丰度或土壤质量的指标。在某些情况下,与割草相比,规定的燃烧显示出积极的结果,例如更高的前草粗蛋白含量(%),蚂蚁(膜翅目;编号/陷阱),甲虫(鞘翅目/编号/陷阱)和蚱hopper丰度(直翅目;否) (/ sweep)和土壤中的总碳和氮(%),但在这些属性中,与2008年的参考地点相比,仅焚烧地点的蝗虫丰度有所提高。Mo草并没有促进鼠尾草巢穴或早期的统计学显着增加与参考地点相比,育雏动物栖息地的属性,例如食物的覆盖度或营养质量,蚂蚁,甲虫或蚱grass的数量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2014年第4期|813-822|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming, Dept. 3354, 1000 East University Avenue, Laramie, WY 82071, USA,Hayden-Wing Associates, LLC, 2308 South 8th Street, P.O. Box 1689, Laramie, WY 82073, USA;

    Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming, Dept. 3354, 1000 East University Avenue, Laramie, WY 82071, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Centrocercus urophasianus; Forbs; Greater sage-grouse; Insects; Mowing; Prescribed burning; Soil quality;

    机译:尾生尾球菌;前叉鼠尾草更大;昆虫;割草;规定燃烧;土壤质量;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:27:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号