首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects
【24h】

Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects

机译:研究人员的经验,正面和负面的整体景观项目

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Integrative (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) landscape research projects are becoming increasingly common. As a result, researchers are spending a larger proportion of their professional careers doing integrative work, participating in shifting interdisciplinary teams, and cooperating directly with non-academic participants. Despite the growing importance of integrative research, few studies have investigated researchers' experiences in these projects. How do researchers perceive the outcomes of integrative projects, or career effects? Do they view the projects generally as successes or failures? This study analyses researchers' experiences in integrative landscape studies and investigates what factors shape these experiences. The data stems from 19 semi-structured qualitative interviews and a Web-based survey among 207 participants in integrative landscape research projects. It finds that researchers experience participation in integrative projects as positive, in particular discussions among participants, networking, teamwork, and gaining new insights and skills. Furthermore, most researchers perceive the projects as successful and as having a positive effect on their careers. Less positive aspects of integration relate to publications and merit points. Factors found to contribute to positive experiences include reaching a high degree of integration amongst the involved disciplines, common definitions of integrative research concepts, and projects that include a large share of fundamental research as well as projects with many project outcomes. Based on these findings, we advise future projects to plan for integration, facilitate discussions, and reach agreement on integrative concepts. We suggest that aspects of fundamental research be included in integrative projects. We also suggest that planning be done at an early stage for peer-reviewed publications, to ensure that participants gain merit points from their participation in integrative research efforts.
机译:综合(跨学科和跨学科)景观研究项目变得越来越普遍。结果,研究人员将其职业生涯的大部分时间用于整合工作,参与跨学科团队的转移以及与非学术参与者的直接合作。尽管整合研究的重要性日益提高,但很少有研究调查研究人员在这些项目中的经验。研究人员如何看待整合项目的成果或职业影响?他们一般将项目视为成功还是失败?本研究分析了研究人员在综合景观研究中的经验,并调查了哪些因素会影响这些经验。数据来自19个半结构化定性访谈和基于网络的调查,涉及207个综合景观研究项目的参与者。研究人员发现,研究人员会积极参与整合项目,尤其是参与者之间的讨论,网络,团队合作以及获得新的见识和技能。此外,大多数研究人员认为这些项目是成功的,并且对他们的职业生涯产生了积极的影响。不太积极的整合方面与出版物和优点有关。被发现有助于积极经验的因素包括所涉学科之间的高度融合,综合研究概念的通用定义以及包括大量基础研究以及具有许多项目成果的项目的项目。基于这些发现,我们建议未来的项目进行整合计划,促进讨论并就整合概念达成协议。我们建议将基础研究的各个方面纳入整合项目。我们还建议为同行评审的出版物尽早进行规划,以确保参与者从参与综合研究工作中获得可取之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号