...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Improving the TMDL process using watershed risk assessment principles
【24h】

Improving the TMDL process using watershed risk assessment principles

机译:使用分水岭风险评估原则改善TMDL流程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Ecological risk assessment (ERA) evaluates potential causal relationships between multiple sources and stressors and impacts on valued ecosystem components. ERAs applied at the watershed scale have many similarities to the place-based analyses that are undertaken to develop Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), in which linkages are established between stressors, sources, and water quality standards, including support of designated uses. TMDLs focus on achieving water quality standards associated with attainment of designated uses. In attempting to attain the water quality standard, many TMDLs focus on the stressor of concern rather than the ecological endpoint or indicators of the designated use that the standard is meant to protect, A watershed ecological risk assessment (WERA), at least in theory, examines effects of most likely stressors, as well as their probable sources in the watershed, to prioritize management options that will most likely result in meeting environmental goals or uses. Useful WERA principles that can be applied to TMDL development include: development and use of comprehensive conceptual models in the Problem Identification step of TMDLs; use of a transparent process for selecting Numeric Targets for TMDLs based on assessment endpoints derived from the management goal or designated use under consideration; analysis of co-occurring stressors likely to cause beneficial use impairment based on the conceptual model; use of explicit uncertainty analyses in the Linkage Analysis step of TMDL development; and frequent stakeholder interactions throughout the process. WERA principles are currently most applicable to those TMDLs in which there is no numeric standard and, therefore, indicators and targets need to be developed, such as many nutrient or sediment TMDLs. WERA methods can also be useful in determining TMDL targets in situations where simply targeting the water quality standard may re-attain the numeric criterion but not the broader designated use. Better incorporation of problem formulation principles from WERA into the TMDL development process would be helpful in improving the scientific rigor of TMDLs.
机译:生态风险评估(ERA)评估多种来源与压力源之间的潜在因果关系,以及对有价值的生态系统组成部分的影响。在分水岭规模上应用的ERA与为开发总最大日负荷(TMDL)而进行的基于地点的分析有很多相似之处,其中在压力源,水源和水质标准之间建立了联系,包括对指定用途的支持。 TMDL致力于达到与指定用途相关的水质标准。为了达到水质标准,许多TMDL至少关注理论上的关注点,而不是该标准旨在保护的生态终点或指定用途的指标(流域生态风险评估(WERA)),研究最有可能的压力源及其在分水岭中可能产生的压力源的影响,以优先考虑最有可能实现环境目标或用途的管理方案。可用于TMDL开发的有用的WERA原则包括:在TMDL的“问题识别”步骤中开发和使用全面的概念模型;基于从管理目标或考虑中的指定用途得出的评估终点,使用透明的过程为TMDL选择数字目标;基于概念模型分析可能导致有益使用损害的共同出现的压力源;在TMDL开发的链接分析步骤中使用显式不确定性分析;在整个过程中以及利益相关者的频繁互动。 WERA原则目前最适用于没有数字标准的TMDL,因此需要制定指标和目标,例如许多营养或沉积物TMDL。在仅以水质标准为目标但不能重新获得数值标准但不能更广泛指定用途的情况下,WERA方法也可用于确定TMDL目标。将WERA的问题提出原则更好地纳入TMDL开发过程中,将有助于提高TMDL的科学严谨性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号