首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Mapping Stream Habitats with a Global Positioning System: Accuracy, Precision, and Comparison with Traditional Methods
【24h】

Mapping Stream Habitats with a Global Positioning System: Accuracy, Precision, and Comparison with Traditional Methods

机译:使用全球定位系统绘制河流栖息地的地图:准确性,精确度以及与传统方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We tested the precision and accuracy of the Trimble GeoXT~(TM) global positioning system (GPS) handheld receiver on point and area features and compared estimates of stream habitat dimensions (e.g., lengths and areas of riffles and pools) that were made in three different Oklahoma streams using the GPS receiver and a tape measure. The precision of differentially corrected GPS (DGPS) points was not affected by the number of GPS position fixes (i.e., geo- graphic location estimates) averaged per DGPS point. Horizontal error of points ranged from 0.03 to 2.77 m and did not differ with the number of position fixes per point. The error of area measurements ranged from 0.1% to 110.1% but decreased as the area increased. Again, error was independent of the number of position fixes averaged per polygon corner. The estimates of habitat lengths, widths, and areas did not differ when measured using two methods of data collection (GPS and a tape measure), nor did the differences among methods change at three stream sites with contrasting morphologies. Measuring features with a GPS receiver was up to 3.3 times faster on average than using a tape measure, although signal interference from high streambanks or overhanging vegetation occasionally limited satellite signal availability and prolonged measurements with a GPS receiver. There were also no differences in precision of habitat dimensions when mapped using a continuous versus a position fix average GPS data collection method. Despite there being some disadvantages to using the GPS in stream habitat studies, measuring stream habitats with a GPS resulted in spatially referenced data that allowed the assessment of relative habitat position and changes in habitats over time, and was often faster than using a tape measure. For most spatial scales of interest, the precision and accuracy of DGPS data are adequate and have logistical advantages when compared to traditional methods of measurement.
机译:我们在点和面特征上测试了Trimble GeoXT〜(TM)全球定位系统(GPS)手持接收器的精度和准确性,并比较了三个地方对河流栖息地尺寸(例如,浅滩和水池的长度和面积)的估计。使用GPS接收器和卷尺测量俄克拉荷马州的不同河流。差分校正GPS(DGPS)点的精度不受每个DGPS点平均得到的GPS定位次数(即地理位置估计)的影响。点的水平误差范围为0.03至2.77 m,并且与每个点的定位点数量没有差异。面积测量的误差范围从0.1%到110.1%,但是随着面积的增加而减小。同样,误差与每个多边形角的平均定位点数无关。当使用两种数据收集方法(GPS和卷尺)进行测量时,生境长度,宽度和面积的估计值没有差异,在三个形态不同的河流点,方法的差异也没有变化。 GPS接收器的测量功能平均比卷尺测量速度快3.3倍,尽管来自高水位或悬垂植被的信号干扰有时会限制卫星信号的可用性,并会延长GPS接收器的测量时间。当使用连续GPS和固定位置平均GPS数据收集方法进行映射时,栖息地尺寸的精度也没有差异。尽管在河流栖息地研究中使用GPS存在一些缺点,但使用GPS测量河流栖息地仍会产生空间参考数据,该数据可用于评估相对栖息地位置和栖息地随时间的变化,并且通常比使用卷尺更快。对于大多数感兴趣的空间尺度,与传统的测量方法相比,DGPS数据的精度和准确性是足够的,并且在物流方面具有优势。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2006年第2期|p.271-280|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Department of Zoology Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 环境保护管理;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:32:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号