首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Harmonizing Methods of Scientific Inference With the Precautionary Principle: Opportunities and Constraints
【24h】

Harmonizing Methods of Scientific Inference With the Precautionary Principle: Opportunities and Constraints

机译:用预防原则协调科学推理的方法:机遇与制约

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Virtually anyone with an interest in environmental pol-icy is familiar with the allegations that traditional methods of statistical inference are biased against preventa-tive environmental standards. They surely also know of the Precautionary Principle as the broad theory often cited by environmentalists to support this critique and to argue that regulated industries should bear the burden of proving that their products and activities are safe. This collision between scientific method and environmental principle has had great salience in environmental law and policy for many years. However, the debate loses much of its force and momentum because it is premised on a relatively superficial understanding of theninderlying statistical methods. This Article seeks to move beyond the heuristics of the current discourse.
机译:几乎任何对环境政策感兴趣的人都熟悉这样的说法,即传统的统计推断方法偏向于预防性的环境标准。他们当然也知道预防原则是环境保护主义者经常引用的广泛理论,以支持这种批评并认为受管制的产业应承担证明其产品和活动安全的负担。多年来,科学方法与环境原则之间的这种冲突在环境法律和政策中引起了极大关注。但是,这场辩论失去了很大的力量和动力,因为它是基于对后来的统计方法的相对肤浅的理解。本文旨在超越当前话语的启发式方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号