首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Revised New Source Review Rule Moving in the Right Direction?: A Deepened New Source Bias, and the Need for Pursuing Sustainable Energy Development in Air Pollution Control Law
【24h】

Is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Revised New Source Review Rule Moving in the Right Direction?: A Deepened New Source Bias, and the Need for Pursuing Sustainable Energy Development in Air Pollution Control Law

机译:美国环境保护局修订的新资源审查规则是否朝着正确的方向发展?:新的资源偏见加深,以及《空气污染控制法》中追求可持续能源发展的需求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This Article analyzes the revised new source review (NSR) rule and argues that it violates the Clean Air Act's (CAA's or the Act's) clean air mandate by changing the preexisting definition of the statutory term "change" and by extending the demand growth exclusion to all sources and creating several NSR-exempt project-based construction activities that are applicable to existing sources, without providing meaningful procedural safeguards. This is because the new rule conflicts directly with the following requirements under the CAA's NSR program: (1) a proposed physical or operational change that would increase emissions or result in collateral emissions must go through NSR preconstruction review; (2) emissions increases and de- creases to be considered in NSR applicability determinations must be contemporaneous; and (3) once NSR is triggered, the stringent technology requirement, the best available control technology (BACT) or the lowest achievable emissions rate (LAER), must be applied to the sources. The Article argues that the revised NSR rule is moving in the wrong direction in that it strengthens a bias against new sources and enlarges preexisting loopholes in favor of old, dirtier sources, which have traditionally enjoyed significant cost advantages over cleaner, more energy-efficient sources under the grandfathering scheme. It observes that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) reliance on the new rule's allegedly minimal impacts on air quality and the nation's decade-long transition to a multi-pollutant trading approach in air pollution control in justifying the rule changes is untenable in view of congressional intent leading to the enactment of NSR and the literal meaning of the term "change." The Article concludes with the argument that the overriding goal in NSR reform is to create a level playing field for all sources, whether new or old, by building sustainability concerns into existing environmental and energy law, for example, through repealing grandfathering, the adoption of output-based emissions standards and, possibly, the enactment of climate change policy aimed at reducing fossil fuel usage.
机译:本文分析了修订后的新资源审查(NSR)规则,并认为它通过更改法定术语“更改”的先前定义并将需求增长排除范围扩展到“清洁空气法案”(CAA或该法案)的清洁空气指令,所有来源,并创建一些适用于现有来源的,基于NSR豁免项目的建筑活动,而没有提供有意义的程序保障。这是因为新规则与CAA的NSR计划下的以下要求直接冲突:(1)提议的物理或操作更改会增加排放量或导致附带排放,必须经过NSR的施工前审查; (2)在NSR适用性确定中要考虑的排放增加和减少必须是同时的; (3)一旦触发了NSR,就必须对排放源采用严格的技术要求,最佳可用控制技术(BACT)或最低可实现排放率(LAER)。该条款认为,修订后的NSR规则朝着错误的方向发展,因为它加强了对新能源的偏见,并扩大了存在的漏洞,转而支持旧的,较脏的能源,传统上,这些能源比清洁,节能的能源具有明显的成本优势。在祖父计划下。报告指出,美国环境保护署(EPA)依赖新规定对空气质量的影响微乎其微,而美国在长达十年的时间里向空气污染控制过渡到多污染物贸易方法以证明该规则的改变是站不住脚的,因为导致制定NSR的国会意图和“变革”一词的字面含义。该文章的结论是,NSR改革的首要目标是通过将可持续性问题纳入现有的环境和能源法中,例如通过废除祖父,采用新的方式,为所有来源(无论新旧)创造一个公平的竞争环境。基于产出的排放标准,以及可能颁布的旨在减少化石燃料使用的气候变化政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号