...
首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Reunion in Salem: Updating the MTBE Controversy
【24h】

Reunion in Salem: Updating the MTBE Controversy

机译:塞勒姆重聚:更新MTBE争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Concerned about groundwater contamination and the potential health effects of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), a gasoline additive used to curtail air pollution, several states have banned its use. Similarly, MTBE has been the subject of a great deal of litigation. And while the Energy Policy Act of 2005 did not ban MTBE outright, it eliminated the federal oxygenate requirement for gasoline, thereby making the additive unnecessary. But according to Richard Faulk and John Gray, the controversy surrounding MTBE is greatly exaggerated. Moreover, MTBE represents only about 11% of the dangerous chemicals in gasoline that leak from USTs into groundwater. Banning MTBE and rushing to the courts does nothing to address the remaining 89% of the chemicals contained in gasoline that are released from USTs when there is a leak. Below, Faulk and Gray argue that instead of subjecting MTBE to a witch hunt, more energy should be spent enforcing the UST program so that past leaks are cleaned up and future ones do not occur.
机译:考虑到地下水污染和用于减少空气污染的汽油添加剂甲基叔丁基醚(MTBE)对健康的潜在影响,一些州已禁止使用它。同样,MTBE也是许多诉讼的主题。尽管2005年的《能源政策法案》没有完全禁止MTBE,但它取消了联邦对汽油的含氧化合物要求,因此无需使用该添加剂。但是根据理查德·福克(Richard Faulk)和约翰·格雷(John Gray)的说法,围绕MTBE的争议被大大夸大了。而且,MTBE仅占从UST泄漏到地下水中的汽油中危险化学品的约11%。禁止MTBE并向法院起诉并没有解决泄漏时从UST释放的汽油中剩余的89%化学品的问题。在下面,福克和格雷认为,与其让MTBE进行猎杀,不如花费更多的精力执行UST计划,以便清理过去的泄漏,避免将来的泄漏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号