首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Fundamental Inconsistencies Between Federal Biofuels Policy and Their Implications
【24h】

Fundamental Inconsistencies Between Federal Biofuels Policy and Their Implications

机译:联邦生物燃料政策及其含义之间的根本矛盾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Biofuel policies under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) housed in the CAA and administered by EPA and under the Internal Revenue Code administered by the Internal Revenue Service are reviewed to demonstrate inconsistencies not only between the statutes, but also the regulations developed by each agency. The lack of harmonization creates unintended consequences of some fuels reaping government incentives and others, being used in similar applications and delivering equitable environmental benefits, receiving no government assistance in the form of tax credits or participating in the RFS. Environmental, end-use applications, fuel property requirements, and financial incentive differences are discussed.
机译:根据CAA中由EPA管理的可再生燃料标准(RFS)以及由国税局管理的《国内税收法》对生物燃料政策进行审查,不仅要证明法规之间的矛盾,还要证明每个机构制定的法规之间的矛盾。缺乏协调会产生意想不到的后果,某些燃料获得了政府的激励,而另一些燃料则被用于类似的应用中,并提供了公平的环境利益,没有以税收抵免或参与RFS的形式获得政府的援助。讨论了环境,最终用途应用,燃料特性要求和财务激励差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号