首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Struggling for Context: An Appraisal of 'Struggling for Air'
【24h】

Struggling for Context: An Appraisal of 'Struggling for Air'

机译:为环境而奋斗:对“为空气而奋斗”的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In sum, Revesz and Lienke's argument that Congress in 1970 should have mandated national air pollution emission standards for existing power plants is correct only in retrospect; the argument ignores the difficulties that would be encountered in actually bringing such standards to pass. It must be remembered that the 1970 Amendments were a breakthrough in air pollution control: Congress had not previously authorized or mandated technology-forcing, or NAAQS, or federal government supervision of states' measures to reduce air pollution.
机译:总之,Revesz和Lienke提出的关于1970年国会应为现有电厂规定国家空气污染排放标准的论点仅在回顾时才是正确的。该论点忽略了在实际通过此类标准时会遇到的困难。必须记住的是,《 1970年修正案》是空气污染控制方面的突破:国会此前未授权或强制实施技术强制或NAAQS,或联邦政府对各州减少空气污染的措施进行监督。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号