首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >How Cheap Is Corporate Talk? Comparing Companies' Comments on Regulations With Their Securities Disclosures
【24h】

How Cheap Is Corporate Talk? Comparing Companies' Comments on Regulations With Their Securities Disclosures

机译:公司谈话有多便宜?将公司对法规的评论与其证券披露进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two audiences—environmental regulators and investors—both need to know how regulations may impact public companies. But when they face adverse regulations, corporate talk is cheap: oil companies made very different predictions about the impact of the Renewable Fuel Standard in their comments and securities disclosures. Fortunately, by measuring this discrepancy, this study will help regulators, investors, and companies to cure it. Regulators must integrate review of securities disclosures into their rulemaking process to gain a more accurate picture of the risks they are imposing on industry. On the flip-side, securities regulators and investors should review comments on regulation to identify regulatory risks that companies are not disclosing. Finally, corporate counsel should anticipate this scrutiny by harmonizing the messages it sends in comments and disclosures.
机译:环境监管者和投资者这两个听众都需要知道法规如何影响上市公司。但是,当他们面对不利的法规时,公司谈话就很便宜:石油公司在其评论和证券披露中对可再生燃料标准的影响做出了截然不同的预测。幸运的是,通过测量这种差异,本研究将帮助监管机构,投资者和公司纠正这种差异。监管机构必须将对证券披露的审查纳入其规则制定过程,以更准确地了解其对行业造成的风险。另一方面,证券监管机构和投资者应审查有关监管的评论,以识别公司未披露的监管风险。最后,公司法律顾问应通过协调其在评论和披露中发送的信息来预期这种审查。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Environmental Law Reporter》 |2017年第8期|10681-10688|共8页
  • 作者

    James W. Coleman;

  • 作者单位

    the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号