首页> 外文期刊>Environmental impact assessment review >Environmental impacts of decommissioning: Onshore versus offshore wind farms
【24h】

Environmental impacts of decommissioning: Onshore versus offshore wind farms

机译:退役的环境影响:洋洋与海上风电场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Increasing concerns over climate change have prompted rapid growth of renewable energy over the past few decades, particularly wind energy. However, as the installation of wind farms rises, so will the need for decommissioning and analysis of the environmental impacts associated with decommissioning. This paper investigates how Environmental Impacts Assessments (EIA) identify, estimate and manage potential impacts of decommissioning. EIAs from 12 onshore and offshore windfarms consented between 2009 and 2014 in England and Scotland were analysed and compared. Attributes of these windfarms' Environmental Statements (ES) were scored under six categories: decommissioning in EIA stages, definitions of decommissioning, amount of analysis, depth of analysis, impacts identified, and proactive planning. Onshore windfarms generally tended to investigate the impacts of decommissioning less than offshore windfarms, even those which gained consent in the same year. The investigation of the impact of decommissioning improved for windfarms consented in the latter years of the study period. Across the ESs there was a lack of analysis of potential impacts from decommissioning in their own right: not simply as a reversal of the construction process. The impacts of different end of life scenarios were not analysed in any of the ESs studied. There is evidence to suggest the presence of windfarms, especially offshore, could in some cases be environmentally beneficial for certain species. However, the ecological impact of removing offshore structures at the end of life is unknown and is currently not investigated nor predicted in EIAs. Understanding the potential implications of full or partial removal of marine structures, or alternatives to decommissioning, could ensure that appropriate mitigation is considered at an early stage by both developer and consenting authority. That being said, it is also important to update the assessment of potential impacts over the life of the project as more information on the environment is gathered and end of life plans develop.
机译:在过去的几十年中,对气候变化的越来越多的对气候变化的担忧促使可再生能源的快速增长,特别是风能。但是,由于风电场的安装升高,因此需要退役和分析与退役相关的环境影响。本文调查了环境影响评估(EIA)如何识别,估计和管理退役的潜在影响。分析了2009年至2014年在英格兰和苏格兰的12架陆上和海上陆上的EIAS,并进行了比较。这些风险渣的环境陈述的属性在六大类中得分:在环境影响评价阶段退役,退役定义,分析量,分析深度,确定的影响以及积极的规划。陆上风钵通常倾向于调查退役的影响低于海上风镖,甚至在同年获得同意的那些。研究时期后几年加工改善了解职的调查。在欧洲的欧洲缺乏分析他们自己的退役潜在的影响:不仅仅是作为建筑过程的逆转。在研究的任何ESS中没有分析不同终身情景的影响。有证据表明,在某些情况下,可能在某些物种环境有益的情况下,可能会有风渣的存在。然而,在生命结束时去除海上结构的生态影响是未知的,目前没有在EIA中调查也没有预测。了解全部或部分地移除海洋结构的潜在影响,或退役的替代方案,可以确保在开发商和同意当局的早期阶段考虑适当的缓解。那个据说,更新项目对项目的生命的评估也很重要,因为有关环境的更多信息,并且终于生命计划发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号