首页> 外文期刊>Environmental history >Purity And Danger: Historical Reflections On The Regulation Of Environmental Pollutants
【24h】

Purity And Danger: Historical Reflections On The Regulation Of Environmental Pollutants

机译:纯度与危险:对环境污染物监管的历史反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For those who study current environmental problems, it is easy to assume that the history of those problems, however interesting, is not essential or even relevant to their solution. Yet as we debate how to respond to contemporary dilemmas, we might consider the knowledge and the vocabulary with which we conduct the argument. Debates over chemicals and their regulation are, at root, debates about the relationship between bodies and their environments. Embedded within these arguments are assumptions about the nature of both bodies and the spaces within which those bodies dwell: It is history that allows us to understand how we came to perceive health, disease, and environmental pollution in the ways that we do. So what are the contexts that gave rise to modern forms of environmental regulation in the United States? And what historical assumptions about bodies and disease do we reproduce in current discussions of regulation and chemical pollutants?
机译:对于那些研究当前环境问题的人来说,很容易假设这些问题的历史无论多么有趣,都不是必不可少的,甚至与其解决方案无关。然而,当我们辩论如何应对当代的困境时,我们可能会考虑进行辩论的知识和词汇。从根本上说,关于化学物质及其法规的辩论是关于身体与环境之间关系的辩论。这些论点中包含关于两个物体的本质以及这些物体所处空间的假设:历史使我们能够了解我们如何以自己的方式来感知健康,疾病和环境污染。那么,在什么情况下导致了美国现代形式的环境监管?在当前有关法规和化学污染物的讨论中,我们会重现关于身体和疾病的哪些历史假设?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental history》 |2008年第4期|651-658|共8页
  • 作者

    LINDA NASH;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:09:08

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号