首页> 外文期刊>Environmental earth sciences >Comparing arsenic(Ⅴ) adsorption by two types of red soil weathered from granite and sandstone in Hunan, China
【24h】

Comparing arsenic(Ⅴ) adsorption by two types of red soil weathered from granite and sandstone in Hunan, China

机译:将砷(ⅴ)吸附于两种类型的红壤,湖南湖南山丘和砂岩风化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Different soils have large differences in efficiencies and mechanisms in arsenic (As) adsorption, due to the dissimilarities of soil minerals, organic matter (OM) and physiochemical properties. To understand the differences of As adsorption resulting from these differences among soils, the red soil weathered from granite (RS-G) and sandstone (RS-S) were employed to comparatively study the minerals, OM, physicochemical properties, and the isotherms and kinetics of As(V) adsorption. The soil samples were collected at 0–20 cm depth on the top of the mother rocks in Dingziwan and Yuelu Mountain, Changsha, Hunan province in China. The soil minerals were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD). The specific surface area (SSA) of the soil samples was determined using a BET Analyzer with nitrogen and multi-point analysis after degassing overnight at 100 °C. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was determined by the method of ammonium acetate centrifugal exchange, and the OM, pH, and point of zero charge (pHPZC) were measured using improved potassium dichromate volumetric weight method, titration, and potentiometric titration method, respectively. The As(V) in the solution was measured by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS). RS-G contains more clay minerals and iron (hydr)oxides, and less quartz than RS-S by 25.31%, 111.69%, and − 22.39%, respectively. There are similar SSA, CEC, and OM content, but different pHpzc and OM sources between the two soil types. The adsorption experiments reveal (1) the As(V) removal efficiency drops rapidly as the initial As(V) concentration is greater than 4.0 mg/L for RS-G and 8.0 mg/L for RS-S, and that of RS-S decreases more slowly as the As(V) concentration increasing from 4.0 to 20.0 mg/L, (2) the As(V) removal efficiency decreases rapidly as the pH is larger than 8.0 for RS-G and 7.0 for RS-S, and (3) the time reaching equilibrium is 120 min for RS-G and 180 min for RS-S, and their kinetics show two and three stages adsorption processes, respectively. The higher mineral content and pHPZC are the main causes for RS-G showing higher As(V) removal efficiency, shorter time to reach equilibrium, and wider pH range for As(V) adsorption. The young OM in RS-G may be responsible for the rapid decrease of As(V) removal efficiency as the As(V) concentration larger than 4.0 mg/L. Comparatively, the RS-G is more efficient for As(V) adsorption, and is more potential for groundwater protection from As contamination.
机译:由于土壤矿物质,有机物(OM)和生理化学特性的不同,不同的土壤具有巨大效率和机制的效率和机制差异很大。要了解由于土壤中的这些差异导致的吸附,从花岗岩(RS-G)和砂岩(RS-S)中的红色土壤均用于相互作用,相对研究矿物质,OM,物理化学性质和等温和动力学AS(v)吸附。土壤样品在北南省长湖南省长沙,湖南省长沙的母岩顶部的0-20cm深度收集。土壤矿物质的特征是X射线粉末衍射(XRD)。使用BET分析仪在100℃下脱气后脱气后,使用BET分析仪测定土壤样品的比表面积(SSA)。阳离子交换能力(CEC)由醋酸铵离心交换的方法测定,并且使用改进的二铬酸钾体积重量法,滴定和电位滴定法测定OM,pH和零电荷点(PHPZC) 。通过石墨炉原子吸收光谱法(GFAAs)测量溶液中的AS(V)。 RS-G分别含有更多的粘土矿物和铁(液)氧化物,较少比RS-S少25.31%,111.69%,分别为-22.39%。有类似的SSA,CEC和OM内容,但两种土壤类型之间的PHPZC和OM源不同。吸附实验揭示(1)AS(v)除去效率随着初始的(v)浓度大于4.0mg / l的RS-G和RS-S的8.0 mg / L,以及RS- S从4.0至20.0mg / L中增加的AS(v)浓度较慢降低,(2)AS(v)去除效率随着RS-G和7.0的RS-S大于8.0而迅速降低, (3)RS-G和RS-S的RS-G和180分钟的时间达到均衡时间为120分钟,其动力学分别显示出两个和三个级吸附过程。矿物质含量较高,PHPZC是RS-G的主要原因显示出更高的(v)去除效率,延长均衡的时间较短,并且较宽的pH范围为(v)吸附。 RS-G中的年轻OM可能负责AS(v)浓度大于4.0 mg / l的快速降低。相比之下,RS-G更有效地吸附(V)吸附,并且更具潜力从作为污染的地下水保护。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental earth sciences》 |2021年第10期|376.1-376.11|共11页
  • 作者单位

    School of Hydraulic Engineering Changsha University of Science and Technology Changsha 410114 China|Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Science and Water Hazard Prevention Changsha University of Science and Technology Changsha 410114 China|Key Laboratory of Dongting Lake Aquatic Eco-Environmental Control and Restoration of Hunan Province Changsha 410114 China;

    School of Hydraulic Engineering Changsha University of Science and Technology Changsha 410114 China;

    Hunan Investigation Center of Hydrology and Water Resources Changsha 410008 China;

    School of Hydraulic Engineering Changsha University of Science and Technology Changsha 410114 China;

    School of Hydraulic Engineering Changsha University of Science and Technology Changsha 410114 China|Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Science and Water Hazard Prevention Changsha University of Science and Technology Changsha 410114 China|Key Laboratory of Dongting Lake Aquatic Eco-Environmental Control and Restoration of Hunan Province Changsha 410114 China;

    School of Hydraulic Engineering Changsha University of Science and Technology Changsha 410114 China|Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Science and Water Hazard Prevention Changsha University of Science and Technology Changsha 410114 China|Key Laboratory of Dongting Lake Aquatic Eco-Environmental Control and Restoration of Hunan Province Changsha 410114 China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Arsenic (V) adsorption; Weathered soil; Granite; Sandstone; Isotherm; Kinetics;

    机译:砷(v)吸附;风化土壤;花岗岩;砂岩;等温线;动力学;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号