首页> 外文期刊>Environmental earth sciences >Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part I: membrane fouling
【24h】

Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part I: membrane fouling

机译:移动床膜生物反应器与常规膜生物反应器系统之间的比较。第一部分:膜污染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The combination of moving bed biofilm reactor and traditional membrane bioreactor (MBR) shows great potential to be widely used in Liaohe River basin for wastewater treatment. The aim of this research is to compare the bioreactor performance and membrane fouling between integrated fixed-film activated sludge membrane bioreactor (IFAS-MBR) and MBR. Two lab-scale reactors were operated in parallel to treat synthetic municipal wastewater with continuous operation. The results indicated that both systems had the same high removal efficiency of ammonium, while the IFAS-MBR showed a higher ability to remove COD. The transmembrane pressure in the MBR was higher than that in the IFAS-MBR during the entire operation, due to a higher total modified fouling index of the mixed liquor and the resultant higher membrane fouling potential. The concentrations of extracellular polymeric substances and soluble microbial products were higher in MBR, despite the functional groups were almost similar in two reactors. The conventional MBR had more small molecular weight components (<1 kDa) and soluble microbial metabolites. This seems to cause pore blocking, which directly results in membrane flux declining and membrane resistance rising in the MBR system. In addition, the MBR was characterized by a serious membrane fouling as more dense deposits were observed by scanning electron microscopy. On the contrary, the IFAS-MBR showed a lower membrane fouling tendency during the whole operation.
机译:移动床生物膜反应器与传统膜生物反应器(MBR)的结合显示出巨大的潜力,可在辽河流域广泛用于废水处理。这项研究的目的是比较集成固定膜活性污泥膜生物反应器(IFAS-MBR)和MBR之间的生物反应器性能和膜污染。两个实验室规模的反应器并联运行,以连续运行方式处理合成市政废水。结果表明,两种系统对氨的去除​​效率均相同,而IFAS-MBR去除COD的能力更高。在整个操作过程中,MBR中的跨膜压力高于IFAS-MBR中的膜压力,这是因为混合液的总改良结垢指数更高,从而产生了更高的膜结垢潜力。尽管两个反应器中的官能团几乎相似,但MBR中细胞外聚合物质和可溶性微生物产物的浓度较高。常规的MBR具有更多的小分子量成分(<1 kDa)和可溶性微生物代谢产物。这似乎导致孔阻塞,这直接导致MBR系统中膜通量下降和膜电阻上升。另外,MBR的特征在于严重的膜污染,因为通过扫描电子显微镜观察到更致密的沉积物。相反,IFAS-MBR在整个操作过程中显示出较低的膜污染趋势。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental earth sciences》 |2015年第9期|4881-4890|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China|Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Dept Urban Water Environm Res, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China|Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Civil & Environm Engn Sch, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China|Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Dept Urban Water Environm Res, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China|Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Dept Urban Water Environm Res, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China;

    Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Civil & Environm Engn Sch, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China|Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Dept Urban Water Environm Res, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Moving bed biofilm membrane bioreactor; Conventional membrane bioreactor; Extracellular polymeric substances; Soluble microbial products; Membrane fouling;

    机译:移动床生物膜膜生物反应器;常规膜生物反应器;细胞外聚合物;可溶性微生物产品;膜污染;生物膜;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号