首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Geochemistry and Health >Application of various cytotoxic endpoints for the toxicity prioritization of fine dust (PM2.5) sources using a multi-criteria decision-making approach
【24h】

Application of various cytotoxic endpoints for the toxicity prioritization of fine dust (PM2.5) sources using a multi-criteria decision-making approach

机译:各种细胞毒性终点的应用,使用多标准决策方法对细粉(PM2.5)源的毒性优先级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fine dust (PM2.5) is generated from various sources, and many studies have reported on the sources of PM2.5. However, the current research on PM2.5 toxicity based on its sources is insufficient. In this study, we developed a framework for the prioritization of fine dust (PM2.5) sources on the basis of the multi-endpoint toxicities using the multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM). To obtain the multi-endpoint toxicities of PM2.5 sources, cell mortality, reactive oxygen species (ROS), inflammation and mutagenicity were measured for diesel exhaust particles (DEP), gasoline exhaust particles (GEP), rice straw burning particles (RBP), coal combustion particles (CCP) and tunnel dust particles (TDP). The integrative toxicity score (ITS) of the PM2.5 source was calculated using MCDM, which consist of four steps: (1) defining the decision-making matrix, (2) normalization and weighting, (3) calculating the ITS (linear aggregation) and (4) a global sensitivity analysis. The indicator of cell mortality had the highest weight (0.3780) followed by inflammation (0.2471), ROS (0.2178) and mutagenicity (0.1571). Additionally, the ITS based on the sources contributing to PM2.5 resulted in the following order: DEP (0.89), GEP (0.44), RBP (0.40), CCP (0.23) and TDP (0.06). The relative toxicity index (RTI), which represents the ratio of toxicity due to the difference in sources, increases as the contribution of the highly toxic sources increases. The RTI over 1 is closely associated with an increased contribution from highly toxic sources, such as diesel exhaust, gasoline exhaust and biomass burning. It is necessary to investigate the toxicity of various PM2.5 sources and PM2.5 risk based on the sources.
机译:精细粉尘(PM2.5)来自各种来源,许多研究报告了PM2.5的来源。然而,基于其来源的PM2.5毒性目前的研究不足。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种利用多标准决策方法(MCDM)的多端点毒性优先考虑细粉(PM2.5)源优先序列的框架。为了获得PM2.5源的多端点毒性,测量柴油机排气颗粒(DEP),汽油废气颗粒(GEP),稻草燃烧颗粒(RBP)测量细胞死亡率,反应性氧物质(ROS),炎症和致突变性,肉瘤,煤燃烧颗粒(CCP)和隧道粉尘颗粒(TDP)。 PM2.5源的综合毒性得分(其)使用MCDM计算,该MCDM由四个步骤组成:(1)定义决策矩阵,(2)归一化和加权,(3)计算其(线性聚集(4)全局敏感性分析。细胞死亡率的指标具有最高的重量(0.3780),然后是炎症(0.2471),ROS(0.2178)和致突变性(0.1571)。另外,基于贡献PM2.5的来源导致以下顺序:DEP(0.89),GEP(0.44),RBP(0.40),CCP(0.23)和TDP(0.06)。相对毒性指数(RTI)表示由于源极差异导致的毒性的比例随着高毒来源的贡献而增加​​。 RTI超过1与高毒源的贡献增加了密切相关,例如柴油排气,汽油排气和生物质燃烧。基于来源,有必要研究各种PM2.5来源和PM2.5的风险的毒性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Geochemistry and Health》 |2020年第6期|1775-1788|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Gwangju Inst Sci & Technol Sch Earth Sci & Environm Engn 123 Cheomdangwagi Ro Gwangju 61005 South Korea|Gwangju Inst Sci & Technol Ctr Chem Risk Assessment 123 Cheomdangwagi Ro Gwangju 61005 South Korea;

    Gwangju Inst Sci & Technol Sch Earth Sci & Environm Engn 123 Cheomdangwagi Ro Gwangju 61005 South Korea;

    Gwangju Inst Sci & Technol Sch Earth Sci & Environm Engn 123 Cheomdangwagi Ro Gwangju 61005 South Korea;

    Gwangju Inst Sci & Technol Sch Earth Sci & Environm Engn 123 Cheomdangwagi Ro Gwangju 61005 South Korea;

    Chungbuk Natl Univ Dept Ind Plant Sci & Technol Cheongju South Korea;

    KT&G R&D Headquarter Daejeon South Korea;

    Gwangju Inst Sci & Technol Sch Earth Sci & Environm Engn 123 Cheomdangwagi Ro Gwangju 61005 South Korea|Gwangju Inst Sci & Technol Ctr Chem Risk Assessment 123 Cheomdangwagi Ro Gwangju 61005 South Korea;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    PM2; 5 sources; Cytotoxicity; Toxicity index; Risk assessment; Decision-making; Objective weighting;

    机译:PM2;5来源;细胞毒性;毒性指数;风险评估;决策;客观加权;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号