首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Fluid Mechanics >Ensemble Bayesian model averaging using Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling
【24h】

Ensemble Bayesian model averaging using Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling

机译:使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛采样的Ensemble贝叶斯模型平均

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bayesian model averaging (BMA) has recently been proposed as a statistical method to calibrate forecast ensembles from numerical weather models. Successful implementation of BMA however, requires accurate estimates of the weights and variances of the individual competing models in the ensemble. In their seminal paper (Raftery et al. Mon Weather Rev 133:1155–1174, 2005) has recommended the Expectation–Maximization (EM) algorithm for BMA model training, even though global convergence of this algorithm cannot be guaranteed. In this paper, we compare the performance of the EM algorithm and the recently developed DiffeRential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis (DREAM) Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm for estimating the BMA weights and variances. Simulation experiments using 48-hour ensemble data of surface temperature and multi-model streamflow forecasts show that both methods produce similar results, and that their performance is unaffected by the length of the training data set. However, MCMC simulation with DREAM is capable of efficiently handling a wide variety of BMA predictive distributions, and provides useful information about the uncertainty associated with the estimated BMA weights and variances.
机译:最近提出了贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)作为从数值天气模型中校准预报集合的一种统计方法。但是,BMA的成功实施需要对集合中各个竞争模型的权重和方差进行准确估计。在他们的开创性论文(Raftery等人,Mon Weather Rev 133:1155-1174,2005)中,尽管不能保证该算法的全局收敛性,但仍建议将期望最大化(EM)算法用于BMA模型训练。在本文中,我们比较了EM算法和最近开发的差分演化自适应都会(DREAM)马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛(MCMC)算法的性能,以估计BMA权重和方差。使用48小时表面温度集合数据和多模型流量预测进行的仿真实验表明,两种方法均产生相似的结果,并且其性能不受训练数据集长度的影响。但是,使用DREAM进行的MCMC仿真能够有效处理各种BMA预测分布,并提供有关与估计BMA权重和方差相关的不确定性的有用信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号