...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Economics and Policy Studies >Commitment or no-commitment to monitoring in emission tax systems?
【24h】

Commitment or no-commitment to monitoring in emission tax systems?

机译:是否承诺或不承诺排放税制度中的监测?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper analyzes and compares behaviors of regulators and polluting firms in emission tax systems with and without commitment to monitoring. In the commitment case, firms can be compliant or non-compliant at equilibria. Firms’ compliance implies that regulators will face the paradox of ex ante commitment to monitoring. However, we find that the commitment system is at least as efficient as the no-commitment system. This suggests that the commitment system has merit even the paradox of ex ante commitment may exist. Finally, relative magnitudes of firms’ optimal and reported emissions in the two systems are uncertain, unless their weights in the social cost function are greater than or equal to one. Relative values of equilibrium monitoring probabilities and fines in the two systems are also unsure.
机译:本文分析和比较了监管者和污染者在有或没有监督义务的情况下在排放税体系中的行为。在承诺的情况下,公司在均衡时可以合规或不合规。企业的合规性意味着监管机构将面临事前承诺进行监督的悖论。但是,我们发现承诺系统至少与无承诺系统一样有效。这表明即使可能存在事前承诺的悖论,承诺体系也值得。最后,除非企业在社会成本函数中的权重大于或等于1,否则它们在两个系统中的最优排放量和报告排放量的相对大小是不确定的。两个系统中的平衡监视概率和罚款的相对值也不确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号