...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental communication >Between Guilt and Obligation: Debating the Responsibility for Climate Change and Climate Politics in the Media
【24h】

Between Guilt and Obligation: Debating the Responsibility for Climate Change and Climate Politics in the Media

机译:罪行与义务之间:辩论气候变化和气候政治的责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The "common but differentiated responsibility" of developed and developing countries to mitigate climate change is a core principle of international climate politics-but there is disagreement about what this "differentiated responsibility" amounts to. We investigate how newspapers in developed countries (Australia, Germany, United States) and emerging economies (Brazil, India) covered this debate during the UN climate summits in 2004, 2009, and 2014. Newspapers in both types of countries attributed more responsibility to developed than to developing countries. In line with social identity theory, however, media in developed countries attributed less causal responsibility (blame) to other developed countries than media in emerging economies. The latter countries' media, in turn, attributed less responsibility to other developing countries than media in developed countries. At the same time, in line with the "differentiated responsibility", media in developed countries attributed more responsibility to their own countries than media in emerging economies.
机译:发达国家和发展中国家的“共同但差异的责任”是减轻气候变化的核心原则,是国际气候政治的核心原则 - 但是关于这种“差异化责任”的数额存在分歧。我们调查发达国家(澳大利亚,德国,美国)和新兴经济体(巴西,印度)在2004年,2009年,2009年和2014年的辩论中涉及这一辩论。两种国家的报纸将更多的责任归咎于开发的责任比发展中国家。然而,符合社会认同理论,发达国家的媒体归因于其他发达国家的因果责任(责备),而不是新兴经济体中的媒体。后者国家的媒体又归因于其他发展中国家的责任,而不是发达国家的媒体。与此同时,符合“差异化的责任”,发达国家的媒体对自己的国家的责任归因于新兴经济体中的媒体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号