首页> 外文期刊>Environmental communication >Nuclear Citizens Jury: From Local Deliberations to Transboundary and Transgenerational Legal Dilemmas
【24h】

Nuclear Citizens Jury: From Local Deliberations to Transboundary and Transgenerational Legal Dilemmas

机译:核公民陪审团:从地方审议到跨界和转基因的法律困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

South Australia is home to one of the world's largest uranium mines for export, but does not participate in further stages of the nuclear fuel cycle. In 2016, the Government of South Australia held a series of public engagement activities about the possibility of nuclear waste storage in the state. Two citizens' juries, collectively called the "Nuclear Citizens Jury," were the centrepiece of the series. This paper investigates jury members' perspectives on nuclear waste storage and the deliberative process. The Nuclear Citizens Jury was effective as a local deliberation process that offered learning opportunities, gave access to information and made decision-making transparent. However, the process did not result in consensus or consent. Rather, jury members highlighted concerns about the democratic representativeness of the process, Aboriginal and transgenerational consent and unresolved national dimensions. The Nuclear Citizens Jury underscored the need for deliberative processes to consider multiple geographies of law, representation, and consent.
机译:南澳大利亚是世界上最大的出口矿山之一的所在地,但不参与核燃料循环的进一步阶段。 2016年,南澳大利亚政府举行了一系列关于国家核废料储存的可能性的公众参与活动。两个公民的陪审团,集体称为“核公民陪审团”,是该系列的核心。本文调查了陪审团成员对核废料储存和审议过程的观点。核公民陪审团作为一个提供学习机会的地方审议进程,获得了信息,并提供了决策透明。但是,该过程没有导致共识或同意。相反,陪审团成员强调对过程的民主代表性,土著和跨代的同意和未解决国家层面的关注。核公民陪审团强调了需要审议法律,代表性和同意的多个地理位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号