...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental & Resource Economics >Fees and the Efficiency of Tractable Permit Systems: An Experimental Approach
【24h】

Fees and the Efficiency of Tractable Permit Systems: An Experimental Approach

机译:费用和可实行许可证制度的效率:一种实验方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The paper presents the results of an economic experiment in which the effects of fees on allocative efficiency of tradable utilization permits (e.g. pollution permits) are explored. Laboratory subjects (university students) play the roles of firms whose generic product requires a specific input or permits. Scarcity is exogenously introduced by a fixed supply of tradable production permits. Three treatments are compared: No fee imposed (N); a fixed tax per permit (T); and partial retraction of permits and subsequent redistribution by auction (A). Treatments T and A represent two different ways of imposing fees, which are designed to be revenue equivalent. Our results indicate that, after controlling for deviation of permit prices from a prediction based on fundamentals, fees have an impact on distribution of permits. Interestingly, a fixed tax enhances efficiency compared to the case of no fees while retraction and reallocation by auction tends to reduce efficiency. Apparently, subjects' decision making is affected by the imposition of fees, but how and to what extent depends on the method used.
机译:本文介绍了一项经济实验的结果,其中探讨了费用对可交易利用许可(例如污染许可)的分配效率的影响。实验科目(大学学生)扮演的公司的通用产品需要特定的投入或许可。固定供应可交易的生产许可证是外来的短缺。比较了三种治疗:不收取费用(N);每个许可证的固定税(T);部分撤回许可证,然后通过拍卖重新分配(A)。处理T和A代表两种不同的收费方式,旨在收取相等的费用。我们的结果表明,在控制许可证价格与基于基本面的预测之间的偏差之后,费用会对许可证的分配产生影响。有趣的是,与不收取费用的情况相比,固定税提高了效率,而通过拍卖收回和重新分配往往会降低效率。显然,受试者的决策受费用的影响,但是如何以及在何种程度上取决于所使用的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号