首页> 外文期刊>Environmental & Resource Economics >Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curves of the Residential Heating Market: A Microeconomic Approach
【24h】

Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curves of the Residential Heating Market: A Microeconomic Approach

机译:住宅供热市场的温室气体减排成本曲线:微观经济学方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we develop a microeconomic approach to deduce greenhouse gas abatement cost curves of the residential heating sector. Our research is based on a system dynamics microsimulation of private households' investment decisions for heating systems to the year 2030. By accounting for household-specific characteristics, we investigate the welfare costs of different abatement policies in terms of the compensating variation and the excess burden. We investigate two policies: (i) a carbon tax and (ii) subsidies on heating system investments. We deduce abatement cost curves for both policies by simulating welfare costs and greenhouse gas emissions to the year 2030. We find that (i) welfare-based abatement costs are generally higher than pure technical equipment costs; (ii) given utility maximizing households a carbon tax is the most welfare-efficient policy and; (iii) if households are not utility maximizing, a subsidy on investments may have lower marginal greenhouse gas abatement costs than a carbon tax.
机译:在本文中,我们开发了一种微观经济学方法来推论住宅供热部门的温室气体减排成本曲线。我们的研究基于对2030年前私人家庭对供暖系统投资决策的系统动力学微观模拟。通过考虑家庭特定特征,我们根据补偿差异和额外负担调查了不同减排政策的福利成本。 。我们研究了两项政策:(i)碳税和(ii)对供热系统投资的补贴。通过模拟到2030年的福利成本和温室气体排放,我们得出了这两种政策的减排成本曲线。我们发现(i)基于福利的减排成本通常高于纯技术设备成本; (ii)鉴于公用事业使家庭最大化,碳税是最有效的福利政策;并且; (iii)如果家庭没有达到最大的效用,那么投资补贴的边际温室气体减排成本可能比碳税低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号