...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >High Court Review of CERCLA Preemption Ruling Not Needed, N.C. Landowners Argue
【24h】

High Court Review of CERCLA Preemption Ruling Not Needed, N.C. Landowners Argue

机译:不需要CERCLA优先裁定的高等法院复审,北卡罗来纳州土地所有人争论不休

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The U.S. Supreme Court doesn't need to weigh in on the legal question of whether the superfund law preempts state statutes of repose, the attorney for North Carolina landowners that filed suit over contamination told Bloomberg BNA (CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, U.S., No. 13-339, opposition brief filed 11/14/13). John Korzen, director of the Appellate Advocacy Clinic at the Wake Forest University School of Law, said Nov. 18 that high court review of the matter isn't needed as there is no meaningful split among appellate court circuits, the issue arises infrequently and the decision being challenged is consistent with its case law.
机译:针对污染问题提起诉讼的北卡罗莱纳州土地所有人的律师告诉彭博社(BTS)(CTS Corp.诉Waldburger,美国,美国最高法院)无需考虑超级基金法是否优先于州休养法的法律问题。 13-339号,反对意见书于11/14/13提交。威克森林大学法学院上诉辩护诊所主任约翰·科岑说,11月18日说,不需要对此事进行高等法院审查,因为上诉法院巡回法庭之间没有有意义的分歧,这个问题很少出现,被质疑的决定与其判例法一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号