...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Citizens for Pa.'s Future v. Ultra Res., Inc.
【24h】

Citizens for Pa.'s Future v. Ultra Res., Inc.

机译:宾夕法尼亚州公民诉Future诉Ultra Res。,Inc.

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Oil and gas company is entitled to judgment on Clean Air Act citizen suit claims brought by environmental group alleging that company's eight compressor stations are "contiguous" and "adjacent" and must be aggregated as single facility that requires nonattainment new source review permit as major stationary source of nitrogen oxide emissions in order to comply with Pennsylvania's state implementation plan, because: (1) plain meaning of "contiguous" and "adjacent" controls whether facilities should be aggregated for air permitting purposes; (2) compressors are located on separate and unconnected parcels of land and do not meet proximity requirement of definition of "contiguous" and "adjacent"; and (3) although functional interrelatedness can lead or contribute to finding of contiguous-ness or adjacency, compressors operate independently of one another and are not functionally interrelated.
机译:石油和天然气公司有权对环保组织提起的《清洁空气法》民事诉讼提出判决,该公司声称该公司的八个压缩机站是“连续的”和“相邻的”,并且必须汇总为单个设施,并要求获得未取得新排放源审查许可作为主要固定设施为了符合宾夕法尼亚州的州实施计划,需要排放氮氧化物的来源,因为:(1)“连续”和“相邻”的简单含义控制着是否应出于允许空气的目的而对设施进行汇总; (2)压缩机位于分开且不相连的土地上,不符合“连续”和“相邻”定义的接近要求; (3)尽管功能上的相互关系可以导致或有助于发现连续性或邻接性,但压缩机彼此独立运行,并且在功能上不相关。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter》 |2015年第13期|1555-1569|共15页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号