首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Corps Water Act Jurisdiction Finding May Be Reviewable Final Agency Action, Justices Say
【24h】

Corps Water Act Jurisdiction Finding May Be Reviewable Final Agency Action, Justices Say

机译:法官说,《兵团水法》管辖权的裁决可能是可审查的最终机构行动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

U.S. Supreme Court justices suggested during oral arguments March 30 that a Clean Water Act juris-dictional determination is a judicially reviewable final agency action because legal consequences flow from it (Hawkes Co. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs, U.S., No. 15-290, oral arguments 3/20/16). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers had presented the question to the court after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that such a determination issued to a Minnesota peat farmer is final agency action, creating a split from the Fifth and Ninth Circuits which ruled that it is not a reviewable action (Hawkes Co. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs, 782 F.3d 994, 80 ERC 1265, 2015 BL 101976 (6th Cir. 2015)).
机译:美国最高法院大法官在3月30日的口头辩论中建议,《清洁水法》的司法裁定是一项可司法审查的最终代理诉讼,因为由此产生法律后果(Hawkes Co.诉US Eng'rs US Army Corps,Eng,No。 15-290,口头辩论3/20/16)。在第八巡回上诉法院裁定发给明尼苏达州泥炭农场主的此类裁决是最终的代理行动之后,美国陆军工程兵团已向法院提出了此问题,这与第五巡回法院和第九巡回法院产生了分歧(Hawkes Co. v。US Army Corps of Eng'rs,782 F.3d 994,80 ERC 1265,2015 BL 101976(6th Cir。2015))。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号